Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States

E4586

Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by affirming Congress’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause.

AI illustration

How this image was made

AI-generated illustration of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States

This AI-generated illustration was produced by black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev (1024x1024) from a prompt written by openai/gpt-oss-120b from the entity's label + description.

Prompt

Generate an image of Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by affirming Congress’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause.)

All labels observed (6)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (52)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ
landmark civil rights case ⓘ
arguedDate October 5, 1964 ⓘ
businessType motel ⓘ
challengedProvision Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ
challengedStatute Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ
citation 379 U.S. 241 ⓘ
constitutionalBasis Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution ⓘ
linked to: Commerce Clause
constitutionalProvisionCited Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionRaised Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate December 14, 1964 ⓘ
decisionType unanimous decision ⓘ
defendant United States ⓘ
fullName Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. ⓘ
holding Congress may prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause ⓘ
Places of public accommodation that serve interstate travelers or use goods that have moved in interstate commerce may be regulated by Congress ⓘ
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause ⓘ
impact expanded interpretation of the Commerce Clause to include regulation of local activities affecting interstate commerce ⓘ
strengthened federal enforcement of civil rights in public accommodations ⓘ
issue constitutionality of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ
justiceInMajority Arthur J. Goldberg ⓘ
Byron R. White ⓘ
Earl Warren ⓘ
Hugo L. Black ⓘ
John M. Harlan II ⓘ
Potter Stewart ⓘ
Tom C. Clark ⓘ
William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ
William O. Douglas ⓘ
legalArea Commerce Clause jurisprudence ⓘ
civil rights law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
public accommodations law ⓘ
locationOfBusiness Atlanta, Georgia ⓘ
linked to: Atlanta
lowerCourt United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ⓘ
lowerCourtDisposition upheld the constitutionality of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Tom C. Clark ⓘ
page 241 ⓘ
plaintiff Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. ⓘ
relatedCase Katzenbach v. McClung ⓘ
reporter United States Reports ⓘ
subjectMatter racial discrimination in public accommodations ⓘ
segregation in lodging facilities ⓘ
supremeCourtDisposition affirmed ⓘ
topic Civil Rights Act of 1964 enforcement ⓘ
federal power over interstate commerce ⓘ
volume 379 ⓘ
year 1964 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (20)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Commerce Clause → interpretedInCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States → fullName → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc., et al. v. United States, et al. ⓘ
linked to: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States → plaintiff → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. ⓘ
linked to: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Civil Rights Act of 1964 → upheldByCourtCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Katzenbach v. McClung → holding → Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s commerce power as applied to local restaurants ⓘ
linked to: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Katzenbach v. McClung → relatedCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Katzenbach v. McClung → precededBy → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States (decided same day, companion case) ⓘ
linked to: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Gibbons v. Ogden → precedentFor → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution → citedIn → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Title II – Public Accommodations → upheldByCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Civil Rights Act of 1964 → relatedCaseLaw → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
subject linked to: CRA 1964
Ollie’s Barbecue case → relatedTo → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Ollie’s Barbecue → relatedCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 → upheldIn → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Public Law 88-352 → subjectOf → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States ⓘ
linked to: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Warren Court era → notableCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ
Interstate Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution → keyCase → Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ