Ollie’s Barbecue case
E53954
The Ollie’s Barbecue case refers to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), which upheld the application of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant under the Commerce Clause, reinforcing federal power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Ollie’s Barbecue (Katzenbach v. McClung) | 1 |
| Ollie’s Barbecue case canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T429834 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ollie’s Barbecue case Context triple: [Katzenbach v. McClung, alsoKnownAs, Ollie’s Barbecue case]
-
A.
Baker v. Nelson
Baker v. Nelson was a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that summarily dismissed a same-sex marriage claim, effectively allowing states to ban such marriages until it was later overturned by Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
B.
Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
-
C.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Ware v. Hylton
Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Ollie’s Barbecue case Target entity description: The Ollie’s Barbecue case refers to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), which upheld the application of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant under the Commerce Clause, reinforcing federal power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations.
-
A.
Baker v. Nelson
Baker v. Nelson was a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that summarily dismissed a same-sex marriage claim, effectively allowing states to ban such marriages until it was later overturned by Obergefell v. Hodges.
-
B.
Branch v. Texas
Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
-
C.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
D.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
E.
Ware v. Hylton
Ware v. Hylton was a 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal treaties override conflicting state laws, helping to establish the authority of the national government under the Constitution.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Commerce Clause case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ landmark civil rights case ⓘ |
| aroseIn |
Birmingham, Alabama
ⓘ
linked to:
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
|
| businessType | family-owned restaurant ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAtDecision | Earl Warren ⓘ |
| citation | 379 U.S. 294 ⓘ |
| citedFor | broad congressional power over interstate commerce in anti-discrimination legislation ⓘ |
| concerns |
interstate commerce in food products
ⓘ
public accommodations ⓘ racial discrimination in restaurant service ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
Commerce Clause
Fourteenth Amendment (context of civil rights enforcement) ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
|
| decidedBy | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1964-12-14 ⓘ |
| decisionType | unanimous decision ⓘ |
| establishedThat | even small, local businesses can be subject to federal regulation if they have a substantial effect on interstate commerce ⓘ |
| foodSupplySource | substantial portion of food purchased from out-of-state suppliers ⓘ |
| geographicScopeOfRuling |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasOfficialName | Katzenbach v. McClung ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress may apply Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant if its operations affect interstate commerce
ⓘ
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s Commerce Clause power as applied to Ollie’s Barbecue ⓘ racial discrimination in restaurants that purchase substantial food from interstate commerce can be regulated under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| impact |
expanded interpretation of the Commerce Clause to cover local discriminatory practices
ⓘ
strengthened enforcement of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ |
| involvesStatute | Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ |
| involvesTitle | Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | United States federal law ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
ⓘ
federal power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations ⓘ scope of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| opinionBy |
Justice Tom C. Clark
ⓘ
linked to:
Tom C. Clark
|
| pageInUnitedStatesReports | 294 ⓘ |
| petitioner |
Nicholas Katzenbach, Attorney General of the United States
ⓘ
linked to:
Nicholas deB. Katzenbach
|
| practiceChallenged | refusal to serve Black customers in the dining area ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later Commerce Clause civil rights cases ⓘ |
| reinforced | federal authority to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations ⓘ |
| relatedAreaOfLaw |
civil rights law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ federalism ⓘ |
| relatedTo | Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States ⓘ |
| respondent |
McClung
ⓘ
Ollie’s Barbecue ⓘ |
| restaurantName | Ollie’s Barbecue ⓘ |
| timePeriod |
Civil Rights Era
ⓘ
linked to:
American civil rights movement
|
| volumeInUnitedStatesReports | 379 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Ollie’s Barbecue case Description of subject: The Ollie’s Barbecue case refers to the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Katzenbach v. McClung (1964), which upheld the application of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to a local restaurant under the Commerce Clause, reinforcing federal power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Ollie’s Barbecue case