respondentState

P36327
predicate

Indicates the state or jurisdiction in which the respondent is located, resides, or is legally associated.

All labels observed (2)

Label Occurrences
respondentState canonical 24
referringState 1

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: respondentState
Generated description
Indicates the state or jurisdiction in which the respondent is located, resides, or is legally associated.

Sample triples (25)

Subject Object
S.S. Wimbledon case Germany ⓘ
Lotus case Turkey ⓘ
Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) Serbia and Montenegro ⓘ
Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro (ICJ, 2007) Republic of Serbia ⓘ
linked to: Serbia
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) Republic of Serbia ⓘ
linked to: Serbia
The Gambia v. Myanmar Myanmar ⓘ
Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide) Russian Federation ⓘ
linked to: Russia
France v. United Kingdom (1953) United Kingdom ⓘ
Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case Ukraine ⓘ
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 Ukraine ⓘ
The Case of the S.S. "Lotus" Turkey ⓘ
P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 17 Poland ⓘ
Philippines v. China (PCA case) People's Republic of China ⓘ
linked to: China
Mali situation at the ICC Republic of Mali via predicate surface "referringState" ⓘ
linked to: Mali
Minquiers and Ecrehos case United Kingdom ⓘ
Perinçek v. Switzerland Switzerland ⓘ
ICJ General List No. 132 Ukraine ⓘ
International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 Chile ⓘ
Obligation to Negotiate Access to the Pacific Ocean (Bolivia v. Chile) Chile ⓘ
Nicaragua v. United States United States of America ⓘ
S.S. Lotus v. Turkey Turkey ⓘ
Permanent Court of International Justice decision in the Lotus case Turkey ⓘ
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) Turkey ⓘ
Lotus (France v. Turkey), P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10 Turkey ⓘ
Factory at Chorzów (Merits) Poland ⓘ