Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)

E851646

Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) is a landmark 1927 decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice that addressed the scope of state jurisdiction in international law following a collision on the high seas.

All labels observed (6)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice ⓘ
international court judgment ⓘ
landmark case in international law ⓘ
alsoKnownAs S.S. Lotus case judgment ⓘ
The Lotus case ⓘ
applicantState France ⓘ
areaOfLaw jurisdiction in international law ⓘ
law of the sea ⓘ
public international law ⓘ
bindingOn parties to the dispute (France and Turkey) ⓘ
citation P.C.I.J. Series A, No. 10 ⓘ
consequence criminal prosecution of French officer Lieutenant Demons in Turkey ⓘ
considered landmark decision of the Permanent Court of International Justice ⓘ
leading case on state jurisdiction in international law ⓘ
court Permanent Court of International Justice ⓘ
decisionDate 1927-09-07 ⓘ
disputeBetween France ⓘ
Turkey ⓘ
factPattern collision caused deaths of Turkish nationals ⓘ
frequentlyCitedIn cases and literature on extraterritorial jurisdiction ⓘ
textbooks on public international law ⓘ
holding Turkey did not act in conflict with international law by instituting criminal proceedings against the French officer ⓘ
influenced development of the permissive view of state jurisdiction in international law ⓘ
later debates on jurisdiction in the law of the sea ⓘ
scholarly concept of the "Lotus principle" ⓘ
keyIssue whether Turkey could exercise criminal jurisdiction over a French officer following a collision on the high seas ⓘ
languageOfJudgment French ⓘ
legalQuestion whether exclusive jurisdiction belonged to the flag state of the vessel on the high seas ⓘ
originatingIncident collision between French steamship Lotus and Turkish collier Boz-Kourt ⓘ
originatingIncidentLocation high seas ⓘ
partyState French Republic ⓘ
Republic of Turkey ⓘ
linked to: Turkey
placeOfCourt The Hague ⓘ
principleArticulated absence of a prohibitive rule does not equal prohibition in international law ⓘ
international law leaves to states a wide measure of discretion in asserting jurisdiction ⓘ
states may exercise jurisdiction unless there is a prohibitive rule of international law ⓘ
relatedVessel Boz-Kourt ⓘ
S.S. Lotus ⓘ
respondentState Turkey ⓘ
result claims of France rejected ⓘ
seriesNumber Series A No. 10 ⓘ
linked to: Series A
status final judgment ⓘ
subjectMatter jurisdiction over incidents on the high seas ⓘ
permissive nature of international law regarding state jurisdiction ⓘ
scope of state criminal jurisdiction in international law ⓘ
successorBody International Court of Justice (as successor to the PCIJ, not to the specific case) ⓘ
temporalContext interwar period ⓘ
yearDecided 1927 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (7)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Publications of the Permanent Court of International Justice, Series A, No. 10 → contains → judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in the Lotus case ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
S.S. Boz-Kourt → legalCase → The Lotus Case ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
S.S. Boz-Kourt → victimShipInCase → The Lotus Case ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
Lotus principle → articulatedIn → Judgment of the Permanent Court of International Justice in S.S. Lotus (1927) ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) → alsoKnownAs → S.S. Lotus case judgment ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)
Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10) → alsoKnownAs → The Lotus case ⓘ
linked to: Lotus case judgment (P.C.I.J. Series A No. 10)