legalCase
P3996
predicate
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
All labels observed (25)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| legalCase canonical | 247 |
| legalActionAgainst | 23 |
| legalChallenge | 20 |
| legalDispute | 18 |
| caseParties | 15 |
| challengedInCase | 15 |
| notableLegalCase | 9 |
| caseInvolved | 7 |
| legalDisputeWith | 5 |
| legalChallenges | 4 |
| legalDisputes | 4 |
| legalCaseName | 3 |
| litigation | 3 |
| courtCase | 2 |
| keyLegalCase | 2 |
| lawsuit | 2 |
| legalCaseCountry | 2 |
| antitrustCase | 1 |
| facesLegalActionFrom | 1 |
| legalCaseInvolves | 1 |
| legalCasePeriod | 1 |
| legalClaimAgainst | 1 |
| legalDisputeAfterDeath | 1 |
| litigationTarget | 1 |
| subjectOfLegalAction | 1 |
Description generation (PDg)
The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.
Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning. # Instructions Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. # Response Format Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: legalCase
Generated description
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
Sample triples (389)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Montgomery bus boycott | Browder v. Gayle ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | flower exporters via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | flower importers via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | wholesalers in the flower trade via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | retailers in the flower trade via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | logistics providers in the flower supply chain via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| International Court of Arbitration for the Flower Trade | horticultural producers via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 | Carter v. Carter Coal Co. via predicate surface "challengedInCase" ⓘ |
| 2000 United States presidential election | Bush v. Gore ⓘ |
| Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933 | United States v. Butler via predicate surface "legalChallenge" ⓘ |
| Tomoyuki Yamashita | Yamashita v. Styer ⓘ |
| William Marsh Rice | murder of William Marsh Rice ⓘ |
| Davis | challenge to federal taxation provisions via predicate surface "caseInvolved" ⓘ |
| Davis | challenge to New Deal social welfare provisions via predicate surface "caseInvolved" ⓘ |
| William Marbury | Marbury v. Madison ⓘ |
|
Edward John Eyre
linked to:
Governor Edward John Eyre
|
prosecutions in Britain for actions in Jamaica ⓘ |
| Mississippi Gestational Age Act | Jackson Women’s Health Organization via predicate surface "litigationTarget" ⓘ |
| Rosa Parks | Browder v. Gayle ⓘ |
| Eduardo Saverin | settled lawsuit with Mark Zuckerberg over Facebook shares via predicate surface "legalDispute" ⓘ |
| Independence Temple Lot | Temple Lot Case ⓘ |
| Independence Temple Lot | 1890s via predicate surface "legalCasePeriod" ⓘ |
| American Tobacco Company | United States v. American Tobacco Co. via predicate surface "antitrustCase" ⓘ |
| Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act |
United States v. Arizona
via predicate surface "legalChallenge"
ⓘ
linked to:
Arizona v. United States
|
| Pentagon Papers | New York Times Co. v. United States ⓘ |
| Pentagon Papers |
United States v. Washington Post Co.
ⓘ
linked to:
New York Times Co. v. United States
|
| John T. Scopes |
Scopes v. State of Tennessee
ⓘ
linked to:
State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes
|
| Claude R. Wickard | Wickard v. Filburn ⓘ |
| John Edwards | involved in federal campaign finance violation case ⓘ |
| Cherokee Nation (historical) |
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
ⓘ
linked to:
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
|
| Cherokee Nation (historical) |
Worcester v. Georgia (1832)
ⓘ
linked to:
Worcester v. Georgia
|
| David Mullins |
Masterpiece Cakeshop
via predicate surface "legalActionAgainst"
ⓘ
linked to:
Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd.
|
| Peter B. Chiafalo | Chiafalo v. Washington ⓘ |
| Narmada Dam project | cases before the Supreme Court of India via predicate surface "legalDispute" ⓘ |
| Narmada Dam project | Narmada Bachao Andolan v. Union of India via predicate surface "keyLegalCase" ⓘ |
|
Criminal Division (Circuit Court of Cook County)
linked to:
Criminal Division
|
prosecutor via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
|
Criminal Division (Circuit Court of Cook County)
linked to:
Criminal Division
|
criminal defendant via predicate surface "caseParties" ⓘ |
| Atticus Finch | Tom Robinson rape trial ⓘ |
| Haji Ali Dargah | public interest litigation on women’s entry ⓘ |
| Harry F. Sinclair | United States v. Harry F. Sinclair via predicate surface "notableLegalCase" ⓘ |
| San Antonio Independent School District | San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez ⓘ |
| Ollie’s Barbecue refused to serve Black customers in its dining area | Katzenbach v. McClung via predicate surface "challengedInCase" ⓘ |
| Ewald Loeser |
United States of America vs. Alfried Krupp et al.
ⓘ
linked to:
Krupp Trial
|
| Vice President’s National Energy Policy Development Group | Judicial Watch, Inc. v. National Energy Policy Development Group ⓘ |
| Vice President’s National Energy Policy Development Group | Sierra Club v. Cheney ⓘ |
| James Douglas, 2nd Duke of Douglas | Douglas Cause via predicate surface "legalDisputeAfterDeath" ⓘ |
| Ram Janmabhoomi | Ayodhya title suit ⓘ |
| Robert Russa Moton High School | Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County ⓘ |
| Mary Doe | Doe v. Bolton ⓘ |
| Mary Doe |
United States
via predicate surface "legalCaseCountry"
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| Cantwell family | Cantwell v. Connecticut ⓘ |