Doe v. Bolton

E13458

Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.

AI illustration

How this image was made

AI-generated illustration of Doe v. Bolton

This AI-generated illustration was produced by black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev (1024x1024) from a prompt written by openai/gpt-oss-120b from the entity's label + description.

Prompt

Generate an image of Doe v. Bolton (Doe v. Bolton is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that, alongside Roe v. Wade, expanded and defined the scope of abortion rights by striking down restrictive state regulations.)

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
abortion case ⓘ
landmark decision ⓘ
citation 410 U.S. 179 ⓘ
companionCaseOf Roe v. Wade ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
linked to: Due Process Clause

Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1973-01-22 ⓘ
decisionType per curiam-like companion to Roe v. Wade ⓘ
defined health of the mother to include physical, emotional, psychological, familial factors, and the woman’s age ⓘ
dissentingJustice Byron R. White ⓘ
William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
fullCaseName Doe et al. v. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, et al. ⓘ
linked to: Doe v. Bolton
held that a residency requirement for women seeking abortions in Georgia was unconstitutional ⓘ
that limiting hospital access for abortions to accredited hospitals was unconstitutional ⓘ
that overly restrictive procedural requirements for obtaining abortions violated the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
that requiring approval by a hospital committee for abortions was unconstitutional ⓘ
that requiring concurrence of multiple physicians for abortions was unconstitutional ⓘ
that several provisions of the Georgia abortion statute were unconstitutional ⓘ
jurisdiction Georgia ⓘ
legalEffect broadened the definition of maternal health in the abortion context ⓘ
expanded the scope of abortion rights recognized in Roe v. Wade ⓘ
limited states' ability to impose procedural barriers to abortion ⓘ
legalSubject abortion ⓘ
privacy rights ⓘ
substantive due process ⓘ
majorityJusticesJoining Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ
Potter Stewart ⓘ
Thurgood Marshall ⓘ
Warren E. Burger ⓘ
William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ
William O. Douglas ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ
originatingJurisdiction State of Georgia ⓘ
pageInUnitedStatesReports 179 ⓘ
petitioner Mary Doe ⓘ
relatedTo reproductive rights in the United States ⓘ
right to privacy ⓘ
respondent Arthur K. Bolton ⓘ
respondentOffice Attorney General of Georgia ⓘ
subsequentHistory limited and effectively overruled in part by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization ⓘ
topic United States constitutional law ⓘ
medical regulation and licensing ⓘ
women’s rights in the United States ⓘ
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 410 ⓘ
yearDecided 1973 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (8)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Roe v. Wade → hasRelatedCase → Doe v. Bolton ⓘ
Doe v. Bolton → fullCaseName → Doe et al. v. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, et al. ⓘ
linked to: Doe v. Bolton
Mary Doe → isPlaintiffIn → Doe v. Bolton ⓘ
Mary Doe → legalCase → Doe v. Bolton ⓘ
Mary Doe → legalCaseCitation → Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973) ⓘ
linked to: Doe v. Bolton
91-902 → relatedPrecedent → Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists ⓘ
linked to: Doe v. Bolton
Arthur K. Bolton → participantIn → Doe v. Bolton ⓘ
Arthur K. Bolton → legalCase → Doe v. Bolton ⓘ