Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case

Target entity: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case
Context triple: [Snake Island, disputedIn, Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case]

• A. Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea
  The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea is a multilateral treaty among the Caspian littoral states that defines their rights, obligations, and jurisdiction over the sea’s waters, seabed, and resources.
• B. Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide)
  Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide) is a contentious case before the International Court of Justice in which Ukraine accuses Russia of misusing genocide claims as a pretext for its 2022 invasion and seeks a ruling on the interpretation and application of the Genocide Convention.
• C. Seabed Disputes Chamber
  The Seabed Disputes Chamber is a specialized judicial body that settles legal disputes related to activities on the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
• D. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
  The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
• E. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
  Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case
Target entity description: The Romania–Ukraine maritime boundary case was an International Court of Justice dispute over the delimitation of the continental shelf and exclusive economic zones in the Black Sea, particularly around Snake Island.

• A. Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea
  The Convention on the Legal Status of the Caspian Sea is a multilateral treaty among the Caspian littoral states that defines their rights, obligations, and jurisdiction over the sea’s waters, seabed, and resources.
• B. Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide)
  Ukraine v. Russian Federation (Allegations of Genocide) is a contentious case before the International Court of Justice in which Ukraine accuses Russia of misusing genocide claims as a pretext for its 2022 invasion and seeks a ruling on the interpretation and application of the Genocide Convention.
• C. Seabed Disputes Chamber
  The Seabed Disputes Chamber is a specialized judicial body that settles legal disputes related to activities on the deep seabed beyond national jurisdiction under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.
• D. International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953)
  The International Court of Justice case France v. United Kingdom (1953) was a territorial dispute in which the ICJ adjudicated sovereignty over the Channel Islands groups of Les Écréhous and Minquiers between the two states.
• E. Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
  Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
• F. None of above. chosen