International Court of Justice ruling of 2014
E830062
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T9950757 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 Context triple: [Peru–Chile border, maritimeBoundarySettledBy, International Court of Justice ruling of 2014]
-
A.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
-
B.
Registry of the International Court of Justice
The Registry of the International Court of Justice is the Court’s permanent administrative and judicial support organ, responsible for managing its proceedings, records, and communications.
-
C.
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
-
D.
Statute of the International Court of Justice
The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
-
E.
Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice
The Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice are the procedural regulations that govern how the Court conducts its judicial functions, including the organization, powers, and duties of its judges and officers.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 Target entity description: The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
-
A.
International Court of Justice ruling of 2009
The International Court of Justice ruling of 2009 is a judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that settled a maritime boundary dispute between Romania and Ukraine in the Black Sea, clarifying the legal impact of Snake Island on the delimitation.
-
B.
Registry of the International Court of Justice
The Registry of the International Court of Justice is the Court’s permanent administrative and judicial support organ, responsible for managing its proceedings, records, and communications.
-
C.
International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975)
The International Court of Justice advisory opinion on Western Sahara (1975) was a landmark legal ruling that concluded Western Sahara was not terra nullius at the time of Spanish colonization and affirmed the Sahrawi people's right to self-determination.
-
D.
Statute of the International Court of Justice
The Statute of the International Court of Justice is the foundational treaty that establishes the Court’s structure, jurisdiction, and procedures as the principal judicial organ of the United Nations.
-
E.
Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice
The Rules of Court of the International Court of Justice are the procedural regulations that govern how the Court conducts its judicial functions, including the organization, powers, and duties of its judges and officers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (46)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
ICJ decision
ⓘ
international court judgment ⓘ maritime boundary case ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Peru v. Chile ICJ judgment
ⓘ
linked to:
Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile)
|
| applicantState | Peru ⓘ |
| bindingOn |
Chile
ⓘ
Peru ⓘ |
| bodyOfWater | Pacific Ocean ⓘ |
| caseType | contentious case ⓘ |
| category |
ICJ cases involving maritime delimitation
ⓘ
territorial and maritime disputes ⓘ |
| concerns |
continental shelf rights
ⓘ
exclusive economic zones ⓘ maritime boundary between Peru and Chile ⓘ |
| countryOfCourt | Netherlands ⓘ |
| court | International Court of Justice ⓘ |
| dateOfJudgment | 2014-01-27 ⓘ |
| decidedBy | judges of the International Court of Justice ⓘ |
| disputeCharacter | sovereign rights over maritime areas ⓘ |
| effectOnChile | maintained sovereignty over key coastal waters adjacent to its coast ⓘ |
| effectOnPeru | granted additional maritime areas beyond existing Chilean-controlled waters ⓘ |
| enforcedBy | parties themselves ⓘ |
| fieldOfLaw |
law of the sea
ⓘ
public international law ⓘ |
| hasPrecedentValueIn | subsequent maritime boundary disputes ⓘ |
| initiatedBy | Peru ⓘ |
| isLandmarkFor |
interpretation of maritime agreements between Latin American states
ⓘ
jurisprudence on maritime delimitation in the Pacific ⓘ |
| judicialOrganOf | United Nations ⓘ |
| languageOfJudgment |
English
ⓘ
French ⓘ |
| legalBasisInvokedByParties |
customary international law
ⓘ
treaties between Peru and Chile ⓘ |
| officialName | Maritime Dispute (Peru v. Chile) ⓘ |
| partiallyGrantedClaimsOf | Peru ⓘ |
| partyRegion | South America ⓘ |
| placeOfCourt | The Hague ⓘ |
| preservedControlOfCoastalWatersFor | Chile ⓘ |
| region |
Southeast Pacific
ⓘ
linked to:
Southeastern Pacific Ocean
|
| relatedOrganization | United Nations ⓘ |
| respondentState | Chile ⓘ |
| resultedIn | new maritime boundary line between Peru and Chile ⓘ |
| status | final and without appeal ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | maritime delimitation ⓘ |
| typeOfBoundary | maritime boundary ⓘ |
| year | 2014 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 Description of subject: The International Court of Justice ruling of 2014 is a landmark judgment by the UN’s principal judicial organ that redefined the maritime boundary between Peru and Chile in the Pacific Ocean, partially granting Peru’s claims while preserving Chile’s control over key coastal waters.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.