Goldberg v. Kelly
E54958
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
All labels observed (5)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T434624 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldberg v. Kelly Context triple: [Due Process Clause, interpretedInCase, Goldberg v. Kelly]
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Goldberg v. Kelly Target entity description: Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
D.
Milliken v. Bradley
Milliken v. Bradley is a landmark 1974 U.S. Supreme Court decision that limited the scope of school desegregation remedies by ruling that courts could not impose cross-district busing plans absent proof of interdistrict segregation.
-
E.
Chiafalo v. Washington
Chiafalo v. Washington is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that unanimously upheld states’ authority to penalize or replace “faithless electors” who do not vote in line with their state’s popular vote in presidential elections.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
due process case ⓘ landmark decision ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
administrative law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ social welfare law ⓘ |
| citation | 397 U.S. 254 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
Fourteenth Amendment
|
| constitutionalRight | right to due process of law ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1970-03-23 ⓘ |
| fullName |
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)
ⓘ
linked to:
Goldberg v. Kelly
|
| holding |
Due process requires a pre-termination hearing when welfare benefits are discontinued
ⓘ
Public assistance benefits are a form of statutory entitlement protected by due process ⓘ Welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before termination of benefits ⓘ |
| impact |
established precedent for due process in entitlement programs
ⓘ
expanded procedural due process protections for government benefit recipients ⓘ influenced administrative hearing procedures nationwide ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| legalIssue |
procedural due process
ⓘ
termination of welfare benefits ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ |
| opinionType | majority opinion ⓘ |
| originatingJurisdiction | New York ⓘ |
| page | 254 ⓘ |
| party |
Jack R. Goldberg
ⓘ
John Kelly ⓘ |
| petitioner | Jack R. Goldberg ⓘ |
| principle |
Due process requires an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner
ⓘ
Due process requires timely and adequate notice before termination of welfare benefits ⓘ Government benefits that are statutory entitlements cannot be terminated without due process ⓘ |
| recognizedInterest | property interest in continued receipt of welfare benefits ⓘ |
| rejectedRequirement | full judicial trial before termination of benefits ⓘ |
| relatedCase | Mathews v. Eldridge ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
entitlement theory of benefits
ⓘ
notice and hearing requirements ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| requiredProcedure |
impartial decision maker
ⓘ
pre-termination evidentiary hearing ⓘ right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses ⓘ right to present evidence and arguments ⓘ written statement of reasons for the decision ⓘ |
| respondent | John Kelly ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
public assistance
ⓘ
welfare benefits ⓘ |
| timePeriod | Warren Court era ⓘ |
| volume | 397 ⓘ |
| vote | 5–3 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Goldberg v. Kelly Description of subject: Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
Referenced by (8)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Goldberg v. Kelly
linked to: Goldberg v. Kelly
linked to: Goldberg v. Kelly
linked to: Goldberg v. Kelly