John Kelly

E301586

John Kelly was the welfare recipient whose challenge to benefit termination procedures led to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court due process case Goldberg v. Kelly.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
John Kelly canonical 3

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (28)

Predicate Object
instanceOf person ⓘ
welfare recipient ⓘ
assertedRight procedural due process under the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
associatedWithLegalDoctrine due process ⓘ
pre-termination hearing requirement for welfare benefits ⓘ
procedural due process ⓘ
caseDecidedBy Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
caseDecisionYear 1970 ⓘ
connectedToConcept entitlement theory of government benefits ⓘ
property interest in public assistance benefits ⓘ
countryOfCitizenship United States of America ⓘ
hasLegalSignificance his case established that welfare benefits are a form of statutory entitlement protected by due process ⓘ
his case led to requirement of evidentiary hearing before termination of certain public benefits ⓘ
influenced procedures for termination of welfare benefits across the United States ⓘ
involvedIn challenge to benefit termination procedures in New York City ⓘ
legalAction challenged termination of public assistance benefits without prior hearing ⓘ
legalRightClaimed notice and opportunity for a hearing before termination of benefits ⓘ
notableFor being the named welfare recipient in Goldberg v. Kelly ⓘ
opposedBy George K. W. Goldberg (Commissioner of Social Services of New York City) ⓘ
partyTo Goldberg v. Kelly ⓘ
received public assistance benefits ⓘ
welfare benefits ⓘ
relatedAreaOfLaw administrative law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
social welfare law ⓘ
roleInCourtCase plaintiff in Goldberg v. Kelly ⓘ
subjectOf Goldberg v. Kelly (1970) U.S. Supreme Court decision ⓘ
linked to: Goldberg v. Kelly
timePeriodOfCase late 1960s ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Goldberg v. Kelly → party → John Kelly ⓘ
Goldberg v. Kelly → respondent → John Kelly ⓘ
Jack R. Goldberg → opposedBy → John Kelly ⓘ