Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

E33469

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.

All labels observed (6)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (50)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
campaign finance case
landmark case
areaOfLaw campaign finance law
constitutional law
election law
arguedDate 2009-03-24
chiefJusticeAtDecision John G. Roberts
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
citation 558 U.S. 310
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decidedIn October Term 2009
decisionDate 2010-01-21
defendant Federal Election Commission
dissentingOpinionBy John Paul Stevens
docketNumber No. 08-205
effect allowed corporations to spend unlimited funds on independent political communications
allowed labor unions to spend unlimited funds on independent political communications
led to growth of Super PACs
fullName Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
holding Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act limits on corporate independent expenditures are unconstitutional
Government may not suppress political speech on the basis of the speaker’s corporate identity
Restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions violate the First Amendment
joinedDissent Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Sonia Sotomayor
Stephen Breyer
linked to: Stephen G. Breyer
joinedMajority Anthony Kennedy
linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy

Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas
John G. Roberts
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.

Samuel Alito
linked to: Samuel A. Alito Jr.
legalIssue First Amendment free speech
campaign finance regulation
independent political expenditures
majorityOpinionBy Anthony Kennedy
linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy
overruledPrecedent Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce
part of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
plaintiff Citizens United
rearguedDate 2009-09-09
relatedStatute Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act
Federal Election Campaign Act
separateOpinionBy Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas
John G. Roberts
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
shortName Citizens United v. FEC
topic corporate political spending
electioneering communications
union political spending
yearDecided 2010

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (14)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

First Amendment to the United States Constitution hasLandmarkCase Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Clarence Thomas notableCaseInvolvement Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Anthony M. Kennedy notableCaseOpinion Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission fullName Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission shortName Citizens United v. FEC
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission plaintiff Citizens United
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Republic, Lost critiques Citizens United v. FEC decision
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Federal Election Campaign Act subjectOf Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Anthony McLeod Kennedy notableWork majority opinion in Citizens United v. FEC
subject linked to: McLeod
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce overruledBy Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
United States Supreme Court cases hasPart Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act challengedInCase Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act challengedInCase FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc.
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act partiallyInvalidatedBy Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission