Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

E33469

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.

AI illustration

How this image was made

AI-generated illustration of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

This AI-generated illustration was produced by black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev (1024x1024) from a prompt written by openai/gpt-oss-120b from the entity's label + description.

Prompt

Generate an image of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.)

All labels observed (6)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (50)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
campaign finance case ⓘ
landmark case ⓘ
areaOfLaw campaign finance law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
election law ⓘ
arguedDate 2009-03-24 ⓘ
chiefJusticeAtDecision John G. Roberts ⓘ
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
citation 558 U.S. 310 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decidedIn October Term 2009 ⓘ
decisionDate 2010-01-21 ⓘ
defendant Federal Election Commission ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy John Paul Stevens ⓘ
docketNumber No. 08-205 ⓘ
effect allowed corporations to spend unlimited funds on independent political communications ⓘ
allowed labor unions to spend unlimited funds on independent political communications ⓘ
led to growth of Super PACs ⓘ
fullName Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
holding Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act limits on corporate independent expenditures are unconstitutional ⓘ
Government may not suppress political speech on the basis of the speaker’s corporate identity ⓘ
Restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions violate the First Amendment ⓘ
joinedDissent Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
Stephen Breyer ⓘ
linked to: Stephen G. Breyer
joinedMajority Anthony Kennedy ⓘ
linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy

Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John G. Roberts ⓘ
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.

Samuel Alito ⓘ
linked to: Samuel A. Alito Jr.
legalIssue First Amendment free speech ⓘ
campaign finance regulation ⓘ
independent political expenditures ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Anthony Kennedy ⓘ
linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy
overruledPrecedent Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce ⓘ
part of McConnell v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
plaintiff Citizens United ⓘ
rearguedDate 2009-09-09 ⓘ
relatedStatute Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act ⓘ
Federal Election Campaign Act ⓘ
separateOpinionBy Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John G. Roberts ⓘ
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
shortName Citizens United v. FEC ⓘ
topic corporate political spending ⓘ
electioneering communications ⓘ
union political spending ⓘ
yearDecided 2010 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (22)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

First Amendment to the United States Constitution → hasLandmarkCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Clarence Thomas → notableCaseInvolvement → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Anthony M. Kennedy → notableCaseOpinion → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission → fullName → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission → shortName → Citizens United v. FEC ⓘ
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission → plaintiff → Citizens United ⓘ
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Republic, Lost → critiques → Citizens United v. FEC decision ⓘ
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Federal Election Campaign Act → subjectOf → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Anthony McLeod Kennedy → notableWork → majority opinion in Citizens United v. FEC ⓘ
subject linked to: McLeod
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce → overruledBy → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act → challengedInCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act → challengedInCase → FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. ⓘ
linked to: Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act → partiallyInvalidatedBy → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti → relatedCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Citizen Koch → subject → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
subject linked to: "Citizen Koch"
United States federal campaign finance law → shapedBy → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Roberts Court → landmarkCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Super PAC → originCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
subject linked to: Super PACs
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission → limitedOverruledBy → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission → isRelatedCase → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ
Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution → mainSubject → Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ⓘ