United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
E140389
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. canonical | 3 |
| United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1228178 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Context triple: [George Sutherland, notableWork, United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.]
-
A.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
B.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
C.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
D.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime internment of Japanese Americans, later widely condemned as a grave civil liberties violation.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Target entity description: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
-
A.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
B.
INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
-
C.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
D.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime internment of Japanese Americans, later widely condemned as a grave civil liberties violation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
foreign affairs law case ⓘ landmark case ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1936-11-19 ⓘ |
| citation |
299 U.S. 304
ⓘ
57 S. Ct. 216 ⓘ 81 L. Ed. 255 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInvolved |
Article II of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
separation of powers doctrine ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1936-12-21 ⓘ |
| defendant |
Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation
ⓘ
linked to:
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
| dissentBy |
Harlan F. Stone
ⓘ
linked to:
Justice Harlan F. Stone
|
| dissentType | in part ⓘ |
| fullName |
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation
ⓘ
linked to:
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
|
| historicalContext |
Chaco War between Bolivia and Paraguay
ⓘ
linked to:
Chaco War
|
| holding |
Congress may accord the President a degree of discretion and freedom from statutory restriction in external affairs that would not be admissible in domestic affairs.
ⓘ
The President has broad, independent, and plenary authority in the field of foreign affairs. ⓘ The President is the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations. ⓘ The nondelegation doctrine is applied less strictly in matters of foreign affairs. ⓘ |
| impact |
Expanded understanding of presidential power in external affairs.
ⓘ
Frequently cited precedent in U.S. foreign relations law. ⓘ Influenced later Supreme Court cases on executive power in foreign affairs. ⓘ |
| issue |
Whether Congress unconstitutionally delegated legislative power to the President in authorizing an arms embargo.
ⓘ
Whether the President possesses inherent powers in foreign affairs beyond those enumerated in the Constitution. ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
delegation of powers
ⓘ
foreign affairs power ⓘ presidential power ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ |
| majorityJusticesJoining |
Charles Evans Hughes
ⓘ
James Clark McReynolds ⓘ Louis Brandeis ⓘ
linked to:
Justice Louis D. Brandeis
Owen J. Roberts ⓘ
linked to:
Justice Owen J. Roberts
Pierce Butler ⓘ Willis Van Devanter ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | George Sutherland ⓘ |
| originatingCourt | District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York ⓘ |
| plaintiff |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| relatedTo |
arms embargo on Bolivia and Paraguay
ⓘ
nondelegation doctrine ⓘ presidential foreign affairs powers ⓘ sole organ doctrine ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| shortName |
Curtiss-Wright
ⓘ
linked to:
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
|
| statuteInterpreted | Joint Resolution of Congress authorizing the President to prohibit arms sales to Bolivia and Paraguay ⓘ |
| volume | 299 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1936 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. Description of subject: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
→
fullName
→
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation
ⓘ
linked to: United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court
→
includesCase
→
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
ⓘ