opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld

E139205

U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion landmark legal decision

The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (6)

Label	Occurrences
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld	4
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (U.S. Supreme Court case)	1
U.S. Supreme Court case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld	1
U.S. Supreme Court decision in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld	1
case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld	1
opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld canonical	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1217786 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Context triple: [John Paul Stevens, notableWork, opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld]

A. Hamdi
Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
B. Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 was a U.S. congressional measure that empowered the president to use military force against Iraq, leading directly to the 2003 invasion and subsequent Iraq War.
C. opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
D. INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
E. Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions
The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions are international treaties that expand and strengthen humanitarian protections for victims of armed conflicts, including civilians and combatants no longer taking part in hostilities.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
Target entity description: The opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice John Paul Stevens, that limited presidential wartime authority by ruling that the military commissions set up to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.

A. Hamdi
Hamdi is a common given name and nickname in Arabic-speaking cultures, often used as a familiar or affectionate form of longer names such as Ahmed.
B. Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002
The Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002 was a U.S. congressional measure that empowered the president to use military force against Iraq, leading directly to the 2003 invasion and subsequent Iraq War.
C. opinion in Ginzburg v. United States
The opinion in Ginzburg v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court decision authored by Justice Potter Stewart that addressed the standards for determining obscenity in mailed publications.
D. INS v. Chadha
INS v. Chadha is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the legislative veto as unconstitutional, significantly reshaping the balance of power between Congress and the executive branch.
E. Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions
The Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions are international treaties that expand and strengthen humanitarian protections for victims of armed conflicts, including civilians and combatants no longer taking part in hostilities.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (48)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion ⓘ landmark legal decision ⓘ
author	Justice John Paul Stevens ⓘ linked to: John Paul Stevens
citation	548 U.S. 557 ⓘ
country	United States ⓘ linked to: United States of America
court	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate	June 29, 2006 ⓘ
dissentingVote	3 ⓘ
held	Detainees at Guantánamo Bay are protected by Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions ⓘ President lacked unilateral authority to establish the challenged military commissions without congressional authorization ⓘ military commissions at issue violated Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions ⓘ military commissions at issue violated the Uniform Code of Military Justice ⓘ military commissions established by President George W. Bush to try Guantánamo detainees violated U.S. law ⓘ procedures of the military commissions departed from court-martial procedures without adequate justification ⓘ
impact	influenced subsequent detainee litigation ⓘ prompted enactment of the Military Commissions Act of 2006 ⓘ
interpretedStatute	Authorization for Use of Military Force of 2001 ⓘ Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 ⓘ Uniform Code of Military Justice ⓘ
interpretedTreaty	Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions ⓘ linked to: Common Article 3 Geneva Conventions of 1949 ⓘ linked to: Geneva Conventions
joinedBy	Justice Anthony Kennedy ⓘ linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy Justice David Souter ⓘ linked to: David H. Souter Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ linked to: Ruth Bader Ginsburg Justice Stephen Breyer ⓘ linked to: Stephen G. Breyer
legalArea	constitutional law ⓘ international humanitarian law ⓘ law of war ⓘ military justice ⓘ separation of powers ⓘ
limited	executive power to create military commissions without Congress ⓘ presidential wartime authority ⓘ
majorityVote	5 ⓘ
opposedBy	Justice Antonin Scalia ⓘ linked to: Antonin Scalia Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ linked to: Clarence Thomas Justice John Paul Stevens (in part by some concurrences and dissents on specific issues) ⓘ linked to: John Paul Stevens Justice Samuel Alito ⓘ linked to: Samuel A. Alito Jr.
partOf	case Hamdan v. Rumsfeld ⓘ linked to: opinion in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
party	Donald Rumsfeld ⓘ Salim Ahmed Hamdan ⓘ
presidingChiefJustice	Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. (recused) ⓘ linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
reaffirmed	applicability of the rule of law in wartime ⓘ judicial review over executive wartime actions ⓘ role of Congress in regulating the military ⓘ
recognized	that Common Article 3 requires a regularly constituted court affording judicial guarantees recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples ⓘ
relatedTo	Guantánamo Bay detention camp ⓘ linked to: U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay trial of Salim Ahmed Hamdan ⓘ war on terror ⓘ

How these facts were elicited