Strader v. Graham
E879790
Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Strader et al. v. Graham | 1 |
| Strader v. Graham canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T10673691 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Strader v. Graham Context triple: [Taney Court, hasNotableDecision, Strader v. Graham]
-
A.
Stone v. Graham
Stone v. Graham is a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court struck down a Kentucky law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms as a violation of the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Ingraham v. Wright
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Griffin v. Breckenridge
Griffin v. Breckenridge is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a federal cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) against private conspiracies to deprive individuals of equal protection or equal privileges and immunities.
-
E.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Strader v. Graham Target entity description: Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
-
A.
Stone v. Graham
Stone v. Graham is a 1980 U.S. Supreme Court decision in which the Burger Court struck down a Kentucky law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms as a violation of the Establishment Clause.
-
B.
Ingraham v. Wright
Ingraham v. Wright is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment does not apply to corporal punishment in public schools and that due process does not require a prior hearing before such discipline is imposed.
-
C.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
D.
Griffin v. Breckenridge
Griffin v. Breckenridge is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that recognized a federal cause of action under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) against private conspiracies to deprive individuals of equal protection or equal privileges and immunities.
-
E.
Ray v. Blair
Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (41)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
legal case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
conflict of laws in slavery cases
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ federal jurisdiction ⓘ |
| category |
United States Supreme Court cases in 1851
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases under the Taney Court ⓘ
linked to:
United States Supreme Court cases
United States slavery case law ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAtDecision |
Roger B. Taney
ⓘ
linked to:
Roger Brooke Taney
|
| citation |
10 How. 82
ⓘ
51 U.S. 82 ⓘ |
| concerns | enslaved musicians who traveled with their owner into free states ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedBefore | Dred Scott v. Sandford ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1851 ⓘ |
| foreshadows | Dred Scott v. Sandford ⓘ |
| fullName |
Strader et al. v. Graham
ⓘ
linked to:
Strader v. Graham
|
| geographicContext |
Indiana
ⓘ
Kentucky ⓘ Ohio ⓘ |
| historicalSignificance |
contributed to antebellum jurisprudence on slavery and federal jurisdiction
ⓘ
limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory ⓘ |
| holding |
The Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to review the decision of the Kentucky Court of Appeals on the status of the enslaved persons.
ⓘ
The status of enslaved persons depended on the law of the slave state to which they returned, not on the law of the free state they had visited. ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| legalIssue |
conflict of laws
ⓘ
reach of free-state laws ⓘ slavery ⓘ status of enslaved persons traveling into free territory ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Roger B. Taney
ⓘ
linked to:
Roger Brooke Taney
|
| originatingCourt | Kentucky Court of Appeals ⓘ |
| parties |
Graham
ⓘ
Strader et al. ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later pro-slavery interpretations of federal constitutional law ⓘ |
| principle |
Free-state laws did not automatically confer permanent freedom on enslaved persons who returned to slave states.
ⓘ
Law of the state of domicile governs the status of enslaved persons upon their return. ⓘ |
| relatedTo | Dred Scott v. Sandford ⓘ |
| result | Judgment of the Kentucky Court of Appeals affirmed ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
interstate effect of slavery laws
ⓘ
slavery in the United States ⓘ |
| timePeriod |
antebellum United States
ⓘ
linked to:
Antebellum period
|
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Strader v. Graham Description of subject: Strader v. Graham was an 1851 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the reach of free-state laws over enslaved people who had traveled into free territory, foreshadowing the reasoning later used in Dred Scott v. Sandford.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Strader v. Graham