Parker v. District of Columbia (2007)

E734919

Parker v. District of Columbia (2007) is a landmark federal appellate court decision that struck down Washington, D.C.’s handgun ban and laid the groundwork for the Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right in District of Columbia v. Heller.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Second Amendment case ⓘ
United States federal appellate court case ⓘ
landmark court decision ⓘ
affects federal constitutional law on firearms ⓘ
gun control laws in the District of Columbia ⓘ
appellateOutcome district court judgment reversed in part ⓘ
challengesLaw D.C. requirement that firearms in the home be kept unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock ⓘ
District of Columbia handgun ban ⓘ
citationStyle Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) ⓘ
directlyLeadsTo District of Columbia v. Heller ⓘ
dissentReason plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the D.C. gun laws ⓘ
hasCitation 478 F.3d 370 ⓘ
hasCourt United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ⓘ
hasDecisionDate March 9, 2007 ⓘ
hasDefendant District of Columbia ⓘ
hasDissentBy Karen LeCraft Henderson ⓘ
hasJurisdiction District of Columbia Circuit ⓘ
hasMajorityOpinionBy Judge Laurence H. Silberman ⓘ
hasMajorityOpinionJoinedBy Thomas B. Griffith NERFINISHED ⓘ
hasPanelJudge Karen LeCraft Henderson ⓘ
Laurence H. Silberman ⓘ
Thomas B. Griffith NERFINISHED ⓘ
hasPlaintiff Shelly Parker ⓘ
other D.C. residents ⓘ
hasProceduralPosture appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ⓘ
hasSubjectMatter Second Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
hasSubsequentCaseName District of Columbia v. Heller ⓘ
hasSubsequentHistory appeal taken to the United States Supreme Court ⓘ
hasYear 2007 ⓘ
held D.C. requirements that firearms in the home be kept nonfunctional violate the Second Amendment ⓘ
the District of Columbia’s handgun ban violates the Second Amendment ⓘ
the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms ⓘ
influenced Supreme Court’s recognition of an individual Second Amendment right in District of Columbia v. Heller ⓘ
interprets Second Amendment as securing an individual right unconnected with militia service ⓘ
involvesConstitutionalProvision Second Amendment ⓘ
involvesLocation Washington, D.C. ⓘ
isLandmarkFor gun rights jurisprudence in the United States ⓘ
individual-right interpretation of the Second Amendment ⓘ
lowerCourtDecision United States District Court for the District of Columbia upheld the D.C. gun laws ⓘ
precedentFor District of Columbia v. Heller ⓘ
rejectsInterpretation collective-rights-only view of the Second Amendment ⓘ
result D.C. handgun ban struck down as unconstitutional ⓘ
D.C. storage requirements for firearms struck down as unconstitutional ⓘ
topic constitutionality of handgun bans ⓘ
scope of the right to keep and bear arms ⓘ
wasAffirmedAsToResultIn District of Columbia v. Heller ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Laurence Silberman → notableCase → Parker v. District of Columbia (2007) ⓘ
subject linked to: Judge Laurence Silberman
Parker v. District of Columbia (2007) → citationStyle → Parker v. District of Columbia, 478 F.3d 370 (D.C. Cir. 2007) ⓘ
linked to: Parker v. District of Columbia (2007)