Baze v. Rees

E649389

Baze v. Rees is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of a three-drug lethal injection protocol under the Eighth Amendment.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Baze v. Rees canonical 4

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (52)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
capital punishment case ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional law ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ
death penalty jurisprudence ⓘ
arguedDate 2008-01-07 ⓘ
chiefJusticeAtDecision John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
citation 553 U.S. 35 ⓘ
concurrenceBy Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
concurrenceInJudgmentBy David H. Souter ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 2008-04-16 ⓘ
decisionType plurality decision ⓘ
dissentBy David H. Souter ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
firstDrugInProtocol sodium thiopental ⓘ
fullName Baze v. Rees ⓘ
holding Kentucky’s three-drug lethal injection protocol does not violate the Eighth Amendment ⓘ
a method of execution is unconstitutional only if it presents a substantial risk of serious harm compared to known and available alternatives ⓘ
impact clarified standards for Eighth Amendment method-of-execution challenges ⓘ
jurisdiction Commonwealth of Kentucky ⓘ
linked to: Kentucky
legalIssue constitutionality of lethal injection under the Eighth Amendment ⓘ
whether Kentucky’s three-drug lethal injection protocol constitutes cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
methodOfExecutionChallenged three-drug lethal injection protocol ⓘ
petitioner Ralph Baze ⓘ
Thomas C. Bowling ⓘ
pluralityJoinedBy Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ
pluralityOpinion yes ⓘ
precedentFor Glossip v. Gross ⓘ
relatedDoctrine cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ
reporter United States Reports ⓘ
requiresShowing availability of a feasible, readily implemented alternative method that significantly reduces a substantial risk of severe pain ⓘ
respondent John D. Rees ⓘ
Kentucky Department of Corrections officials ⓘ
secondDrugInProtocol pancuronium bromide ⓘ
standardAnnounced substantial risk of serious harm standard for method-of-execution challenges ⓘ
startingPageInUSReports 35 ⓘ
stateOfOrigin Kentucky ⓘ
term October Term 2007 ⓘ
thirdDrugInProtocol potassium chloride ⓘ
volumeInUSReports 553 ⓘ
vote 7-2 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Glossip v. Gross → precedentReliedOn → Baze v. Rees ⓘ
Glossip v. Gross → relatedCase → Baze v. Rees ⓘ
Baze v. Rees → fullName → Baze v. Rees ⓘ
Bucklew v. Precythe → precedentCited → Baze v. Rees ⓘ