Glossip v. Gross
E167748
Glossip v. Gross is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of a particular lethal injection drug protocol in executions against Eighth Amendment challenges.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Glossip v. Gross canonical | 5 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1465835 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Glossip v. Gross Context triple: [Stephen G. Breyer, notableCaseParticipation, Glossip v. Gross]
-
A.
Furman v. Georgia
Furman v. Georgia is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily halted capital punishment nationwide by ruling existing death penalty schemes unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
B.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
C.
Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
-
D.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
-
E.
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed the right to court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Glossip v. Gross Target entity description: Glossip v. Gross is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of a particular lethal injection drug protocol in executions against Eighth Amendment challenges.
-
A.
Furman v. Georgia
Furman v. Georgia is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily halted capital punishment nationwide by ruling existing death penalty schemes unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
B.
Gregg v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
-
C.
Escobedo v. Illinois
Escobedo v. Illinois is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that expanded the Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogations and helped lay the groundwork for the later Miranda warnings.
-
D.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
-
E.
Gideon v. Wainwright
Gideon v. Wainwright is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that guaranteed the right to court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants who cannot afford an attorney.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
capital punishment case ⓘ |
| category |
2015 in United States case law
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases on capital punishment ⓘ United States Supreme Court cases on the Eighth Amendment ⓘ
linked to:
United States Supreme Court cases
|
| citation | 576 U.S. 863 ⓘ |
| concurringOpinionBy |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Eighth Amendment ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| decisionDate | 2015-06-29 ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Elena Kagan
ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 14-7955 ⓘ |
| drugInProtocol | midazolam ⓘ |
| executionMethod | lethal injection ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| holding |
Prisoners challenging a method of execution must identify a known and available alternative method that entails a lesser risk of pain
ⓘ
Use of midazolam in Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocol does not violate the Eighth Amendment ⓘ |
| impact | raised burden on inmates challenging methods of execution ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
ⓘ
constitutionality of lethal injection protocol ⓘ cruel and unusual punishments ⓘ |
| majorityJoinedBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ Clarence Thomas ⓘ John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Samuel A. Alito
ⓘ
linked to:
Samuel A. Alito Jr.
|
| overruled | no ⓘ |
| petitioner | Richard Eugene Glossip ⓘ |
| precedentReliedOn | Baze v. Rees ⓘ |
| proceduralPosture | appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Baze v. Rees
ⓘ
Bucklew v. Precythe ⓘ |
| respondent |
Kevin J. Gross
ⓘ
State of Oklahoma ⓘ
linked to:
U.S. state of Oklahoma
|
| resultBelow | judgment of the Tenth Circuit affirmed ⓘ |
| stateInvolved | Oklahoma ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
death penalty procedures
ⓘ
method-of-execution challenge ⓘ |
| term | October Term 2014 ⓘ |
| vote | 5-4 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 2015 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Glossip v. Gross Description of subject: Glossip v. Gross is a 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of a particular lethal injection drug protocol in executions against Eighth Amendment challenges.
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.