Council of Constantinople 1341

E553426

The Council of Constantinople of 1341 was a Byzantine ecclesiastical synod that played a central role in the Hesychast controversy, affirming Gregory Palamas’s defense of hesychast theology and shaping Eastern Orthodox doctrine on divine energies.

All labels observed (6)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Byzantine synod ⓘ
ecclesiastical council ⓘ
alsoKnownAs Palamite Council of 1341 ⓘ
Synod of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
appliesToJurisdiction Eastern Orthodox Church ⓘ
convokedBy Emperor Andronikos III Palaiologos ⓘ
country Byzantine Empire ⓘ
followedBy Council of Constantinople 1347 ⓘ
Council of Constantinople 1351 ⓘ
heldIn Hagia Sophia ⓘ
historicalPeriod Late Byzantine period ⓘ
issue accusations of heresy against Gregory Palamas ⓘ
knowability of God through uncreated energies ⓘ
legitimacy of hesychast prayer practices ⓘ
nature of the Tabor Light ⓘ
relationship between philosophy and theology ⓘ
teachings of Barlaam of Calabria ⓘ
languageOfWork Medieval Greek ⓘ
location Constantinople ⓘ
mainSubject Hesychasm ⓘ
Palamism ⓘ
divine energies ⓘ
essence–energies distinction ⓘ
theology of prayer and contemplation ⓘ
participant Barlaam of Calabria ⓘ
Gregory Palamas ⓘ
linked to: St. Gregory Palamas

Isidore Buchiras ⓘ
John VI Kantakouzenos ⓘ
other Byzantine bishops ⓘ
partOf Hesychast controversy ⓘ
presidedBy Patriarch John XIV Kalekas ⓘ
relatedWork Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts ⓘ
writings of Gregory Palamas ⓘ
result Barlaam’s return to the West ⓘ
Barlaam’s teachings declared erroneous ⓘ
affirmation of hesychast theology ⓘ
affirmation of the essence–energies distinction ⓘ
condemnation of Barlaam of Calabria ⓘ
doctrinal decisions favoring Palamite theology ⓘ
vindication of Gregory Palamas ⓘ
significance formative for Eastern Orthodox doctrine of divine energies ⓘ
foundation for later Palamite councils ⓘ
key stage in the Hesychast controversy ⓘ
startTime 1341 ⓘ
temporalContext reign of Andronikos III Palaiologos ⓘ
theologicalPositionAffirmed possibility of direct experience of God’s uncreated energies ⓘ
real distinction between God’s essence and energies ⓘ
uncreated nature of the Tabor Light ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Triads in Defense of the Holy Hesychasts → associatedWithCouncil → Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
Hesychast controversy → hasPart → Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
Palamite councils of Constantinople → hasPart → Council of Constantinople of June 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
Palamite councils of Constantinople → hasPart → Council of Constantinople of August 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
essence–energies distinction → affirmedBy → Council of Constantinople of 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
Palamism → defendedAt → Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
Tomos of 1351 → relatedTo → Council of Constantinople of 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
Council of Constantinople 1341 → alsoKnownAs → Synod of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
Council of Constantinople 1341 → alsoKnownAs → Palamite Council of 1341 ⓘ
linked to: Council of Constantinople 1341
Council of Constantinople 1347 → follows → Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ
Palamite controversy → hasEvent → Council of Constantinople 1341 ⓘ