United States v. Skilling

E512089

United States v. Skilling is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case involving former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling that significantly narrowed the scope of the federal “honest services” fraud statute.

All labels observed (2)

Label Occurrences
United States v. Skilling canonical 3
Skilling v. United States 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (59)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
criminal law case ⓘ
federal case ⓘ
white-collar crime case ⓘ
arguedDate 2010-03-01 ⓘ
background arose from the prosecution of former Enron CEO Jeffrey Skilling after the collapse of Enron Corporation ⓘ
citation 561 U.S. 358 ⓘ
concurrenceInPartBy Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 2010-06-24 ⓘ
dissentBy Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
docketNumber 08-1394 ⓘ
fullName United States v. Skilling ⓘ
holding 18 U.S.C. § 1346 is properly confined to schemes involving bribes or kickbacks ⓘ
Skilling’s conspiracy conviction was flawed to the extent it rested on honest services fraud theory beyond bribes and kickbacks ⓘ
the honest services fraud statute does not cover mere undisclosed self-dealing without bribes or kickbacks ⓘ
the honest services statute, as narrowed to bribery and kickback schemes, is not unconstitutionally vague ⓘ
impact restricted federal prosecutors’ use of honest services fraud in corruption and corporate fraud cases ⓘ
significantly narrowed the scope of the federal honest services fraud statute ⓘ
joinedWith Black v. United States ⓘ
Weyhrauch v. United States ⓘ
jurisdiction federal ⓘ
legalArea federal criminal law ⓘ
fraud law ⓘ
statutory interpretation ⓘ
white-collar crime ⓘ
legalIssue 18 U.S.C. § 1346 ⓘ
honest services mail fraud ⓘ
honest services wire fraud ⓘ
scope of the federal honest services fraud statute ⓘ
majorityJustices Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
petitioner United States ⓘ
precedentStatus binding precedent in the United States federal courts ⓘ
relatedCase Black v. United States ⓘ
Weyhrauch v. United States ⓘ
relatedOrganization Enron Corporation ⓘ
linked to: Enron
relatedPerson Jeffrey Skilling ⓘ
respondent Jeffrey K. Skilling ⓘ
linked to: Jeffrey Skilling
resultForRespondent convictions were partly vacated and case remanded ⓘ
shortName Skilling ⓘ
statuteInterpreted 18 U.S.C. § 1346 ⓘ
federal mail fraud statute ⓘ
federal wire fraud statute ⓘ
subjectMatter corporate fraud ⓘ
public corruption theories of prosecution ⓘ
timePeriod 2010 ⓘ
topic limitation of honest services fraud to bribery and kickback schemes ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Enron → legalCase → United States v. Skilling ⓘ
Jeffrey Skilling → legalCase → United States v. Skilling ⓘ
Jeffrey Skilling → legalAppeal → Skilling v. United States ⓘ
linked to: United States v. Skilling
United States v. Skilling → fullName → United States v. Skilling ⓘ