Sossamon v. Texas

E494930

Sossamon v. Texas is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held states do not consent to suits for money damages under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act by accepting federal funds, reinforcing principles of state sovereign immunity.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Sossamon v. Texas canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
sovereign immunity case ⓘ
appliesDoctrine clear statement rule for waivers of sovereign immunity ⓘ
sovereign immunity ⓘ
concerns religious exercise rights of institutionalized persons ⓘ
remedies available against states under Spending Clause legislation ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
decisionType 6-2 decision ⓘ
hasArgumentDate 2010-11-02 ⓘ
hasCitation 131 S. Ct. 1651 ⓘ
179 L. Ed. 2d 700 ⓘ
563 U.S. 277 ⓘ
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
hasDecisionDate 2011-04-20 ⓘ
hasDissentingOpinionBy Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
hasDocketNumber 08-1438 ⓘ
hasLegalIssue Congress’s power under the Spending Clause ⓘ
availability of money damages under RLUIPA ⓘ
state sovereign immunity ⓘ
hasMajorityJustices Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Elena Kagan ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
hasPetitioner Harvey Leroy Sossamon III ⓘ
hasRespondent State of Texas ⓘ
linked to: Texas

Texas Department of Criminal Justice ⓘ
holds RLUIPA’s authorization of “appropriate relief” is not a clear waiver of state sovereign immunity to monetary damages ⓘ
Spending Clause legislation must express any waiver of sovereign immunity unambiguously ⓘ
States do not consent to suits for money damages under RLUIPA by accepting federal funds ⓘ
interpretsStatute 42 U.S.C. § 2000cc ⓘ
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-1 ⓘ
42 U.S.C. § 2000cc-2(a) ⓘ
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act ⓘ
legalArea constitutional law ⓘ
federal statutory interpretation ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Clarence Thomas ⓘ
originatedFrom United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ⓘ
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas ⓘ
petitionerStatus state prisoner ⓘ
result judgment of the Fifth Circuit affirmed ⓘ
subjectMatter civil rights of prisoners ⓘ
federal courts and jurisdiction ⓘ
religious liberty ⓘ
yearDecided 2011 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.