Jackson complained that the girls’ basketball team received unequal resources compared to the boys’ team

E475523

Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held individuals are protected from retaliation under Title IX when they complain about sex discrimination in educational programs.

All labels observed (1)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ
landmark Title IX case ⓘ
adverseAction removal from coaching position after complaints ⓘ
areaOfLaw anti-discrimination law ⓘ
civil rights law ⓘ
education law ⓘ
arguedDate 2004-11-30 ⓘ
citation 544 U.S. 167 ⓘ
claimType retaliation for complaining about sex discrimination ⓘ
constitutionalOrStatutoryBasis federal spending clause legislation ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 2005-03-29 ⓘ
factualBackground After Jackson complained about unequal treatment, he was removed from his coaching position ⓘ
Jackson complained that the girls’ basketball team received unequal resources compared to the boys’ team ⓘ
Roderick Jackson was a girls’ basketball coach at a public high school in Birmingham, Alabama ⓘ
federalFundingRequirement applies to educational institutions receiving federal financial assistance ⓘ
fullName Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education ⓘ
genderEqualityContext equal athletic opportunities for female students ⓘ
holding Individuals are protected from retaliation under Title IX when they complain about sex discrimination in educational programs ⓘ
Title IX’s private right of action encompasses claims of retaliation for complaints about sex discrimination ⓘ
impact expanded enforcement of Title IX through private lawsuits ⓘ
strengthened protections for whistleblowers in educational institutions ⓘ
jurisdiction United States ⓘ
legalIssue Title IX retaliation ⓘ
linked to: Title IX

sex discrimination in education ⓘ
locationOfEvents Birmingham, Alabama ⓘ
lowerCourtOutcome Eleventh Circuit held that Title IX did not cover retaliation claims by individuals who were not direct victims of discrimination ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Justice Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
partyRoleOfRoderickJackson girls’ basketball coach ⓘ
high school physical education teacher ⓘ
petitioner Roderick Jackson ⓘ
principleEstablished Retaliation against a person because they complain of sex discrimination is itself intentional discrimination on the basis of sex ⓘ
Title IX protects individuals who complain about sex discrimination even if they are not the direct victims ⓘ
programType educational programs receiving federal financial assistance ⓘ
protectedActivity complaining to school officials about unequal treatment of the girls’ basketball team ⓘ
relatedConcept private right of action under Title IX ⓘ
retaliation as a form of discrimination ⓘ
remedyType damages and injunctive relief under Title IX ⓘ
respondent Birmingham Board of Education ⓘ
shortName Jackson ⓘ
statuteInterpreted Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 ⓘ
linked to: Title IX
subjectMatter federal civil rights enforcement in education ⓘ
sex discrimination in school athletics ⓘ
supremeCourtOutcome reversed the Eleventh Circuit ⓘ
term 2004 Term ⓘ
voteSplit 5-4 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education → factualBackground → Jackson complained that the girls’ basketball team received unequal resources compared to the boys’ team ⓘ