Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
E417628
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
All labels observed (5)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Delgamuukw v. British Columbia canonical | 5 |
| Delgamuukw | 1 |
| Delgamuukw v British Columbia | 1 |
| Delgamuukw v. The Queen | 1 |
| Delgamuukw–Gisdayʼwa land claims case | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4149339 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Context triple: [Gitxsan, involvedInCase, Delgamuukw v. British Columbia]
-
A.
Nisga’a Final Agreement
The Nisga’a Final Agreement is a landmark modern treaty in British Columbia that recognizes Nisga’a self-government and land rights, serving as a key model for contemporary Indigenous–Crown agreements in Canada.
-
B.
Inuvialuit Final Agreement
The Inuvialuit Final Agreement is a comprehensive land claims settlement between the Inuvialuit and the Government of Canada that defines Inuvialuit rights to land, resources, and self-governance in the western Canadian Arctic.
-
C.
Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement
The Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement is a comprehensive modern treaty that recognizes the self-government and land rights of the Inuit of northern Labrador, leading to the creation of the Nunatsiavut Government.
-
D.
Tsawwassen First Nation
Tsawwassen First Nation is an Indigenous Coast Salish community located in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, known for its modern treaty and self-governing status.
-
E.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Target entity description: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
-
A.
Nisga’a Final Agreement
The Nisga’a Final Agreement is a landmark modern treaty in British Columbia that recognizes Nisga’a self-government and land rights, serving as a key model for contemporary Indigenous–Crown agreements in Canada.
-
B.
Inuvialuit Final Agreement
The Inuvialuit Final Agreement is a comprehensive land claims settlement between the Inuvialuit and the Government of Canada that defines Inuvialuit rights to land, resources, and self-governance in the western Canadian Arctic.
-
C.
Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement
The Labrador Inuit Land Claims Agreement is a comprehensive modern treaty that recognizes the self-government and land rights of the Inuit of northern Labrador, leading to the creation of the Nunatsiavut Government.
-
D.
Tsawwassen First Nation
Tsawwassen First Nation is an Indigenous Coast Salish community located in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia, Canada, known for its modern treaty and self-governing status.
-
E.
Mabo v Queensland (No 2)
Mabo v Queensland (No 2) is a landmark 1992 High Court of Australia decision that recognized native title and overturned the doctrine of terra nullius in relation to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land rights.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (52)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Supreme Court of Canada decision
ⓘ
landmark court case ⓘ |
| alsoKnownAs |
Delgamuukw
ⓘ
linked to:
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
Delgamuukw v. The Queen ⓘ
linked to:
Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
|
| appealedFrom | British Columbia Court of Appeal ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeWriting | Antonio Lamer ⓘ |
| citation | [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 ⓘ |
| country | Canada ⓘ |
| court | Supreme Court of Canada ⓘ |
| dateDecided | 1997-12-11 ⓘ |
| defendant | Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia ⓘ |
| holding |
Aboriginal title has an inescapable economic component
ⓘ
Aboriginal title is a collective right held by an Aboriginal nation ⓘ Aboriginal title is a distinct kind of Aboriginal right protected by section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 ⓘ
linked to:
Canadian Aboriginal law
Aboriginal title is a right in land that includes the right to exclusive use and occupation of the land ⓘ Aboriginal title lands cannot be used in a manner irreconcilable with the nature of the group’s attachment to the land ⓘ In some cases, the duty to consult may require full consent of the Aboriginal nation ⓘ Infringements of Aboriginal title must be justified under a stringent test ⓘ Oral histories of Aboriginal peoples must be given due weight as evidence in court ⓘ The Crown has a fiduciary duty toward Aboriginal peoples in relation to Aboriginal title lands ⓘ The Crown must consult with Aboriginal peoples when contemplating actions that may infringe Aboriginal title ⓘ The trial judge erred in his treatment of oral history evidence ⓘ |
| impact |
Affirmed constitutional protection of Aboriginal title under section 35
ⓘ
Fundamentally defined the content and scope of Aboriginal title in Canadian law ⓘ Influenced subsequent Aboriginal law decisions in Canada ⓘ |
| judge |
Antonio Lamer
ⓘ
Beverley McLachlin ⓘ
linked to:
Chief Justice of Canada
Charles Gonthier ⓘ Frank Iacobucci ⓘ Gerard La Forest ⓘ John Major ⓘ
linked to:
John C. Major
Michel Bastarache ⓘ Peter Cory ⓘ |
| legalArea |
Aboriginal law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ property law ⓘ |
| originatingCourt | Supreme Court of British Columbia ⓘ |
| plaintiffCollective |
Gitxsan
ⓘ
Wet’suwet’en ⓘ |
| provinceInvolved | British Columbia ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Calder v. British Columbia (Attorney General)
ⓘ
R. v. Sparrow ⓘ Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia ⓘ
linked to:
Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia
|
| result |
Appeal allowed in part
ⓘ
New trial ordered ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
Aboriginal rights
ⓘ
Aboriginal title ⓘ Crown sovereignty ⓘ fiduciary duty of the Crown ⓘ justification of infringements of Aboriginal rights ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1997 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia Description of subject: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
Referenced by (9)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
linked to: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
linked to: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia
linked to: Delgamuukw v. British Columbia