Weeks

E402793

Weeks is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that established the exclusionary rule, barring evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches and seizures from being used in federal prosecutions.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Weeks canonical 4

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ
landmark case ⓘ
alsoKnownAs Weeks ⓘ
appliesTo federal prosecutions ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional criminal procedure ⓘ
evidence law ⓘ
category United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases on the Fourth Amendment ⓘ
chiefJusticeAtTime Edward Douglass White ⓘ
citation 232 U.S. 383 ⓘ
citationStyle Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914) ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
courtTerm 1913 term of the U.S. Supreme Court ⓘ
decidedBy Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1914-02-24 ⓘ
established federal exclusionary rule ⓘ
governmentActionChallenged warrantless search and seizure of private papers ⓘ
hasShortName Weeks ⓘ
holding Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in federal criminal prosecutions ⓘ
impact strengthened Fourth Amendment protections in federal courts ⓘ
influenced development of the exclusionary rule in U.S. constitutional law ⓘ
jurisdiction United States federal law ⓘ
keyPrinciple courts must not sanction violations of the Constitution by admitting illegally obtained evidence ⓘ
languageOfProceedings English ⓘ
legalDoctrine judicially created remedy for constitutional violations ⓘ
legalIssue Fourth Amendment ⓘ
admissibility of evidence ⓘ
unreasonable searches and seizures ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Justice William R. Day ⓘ
opinionType unanimous decision ⓘ
overruledPriorPractice admission of illegally seized evidence in federal courts ⓘ
pageInUnitedStatesReports 383 ⓘ
partyTypePetitioner criminal defendant ⓘ
partyTypeRespondent federal government ⓘ
petitioner Fremont Weeks ⓘ
precedentFor Mapp v. Ohio ⓘ
precedentialStatus binding precedent in federal courts ⓘ
relatedDoctrine fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine ⓘ
respondent United States ⓘ
resultedIn suppression of evidence seized from Weeks’s home without a warrant ⓘ
subjectMatter criminal procedure ⓘ
search and seizure law ⓘ
subsequentDevelopment exclusionary rule later applied to the states in Mapp v. Ohio (1961) ⓘ
typeOfRemedy exclusion of unconstitutionally obtained evidence ⓘ
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 232 ⓘ
yearDecided 1914 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Weeks v. United States → hasShortName → Weeks ⓘ
subject linked to: Weeks
Weeks v. United States → alsoKnownAs → Weeks ⓘ
subject linked to: Weeks