Miller v. Alabama

E267316

Miller v. Alabama is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments.

All labels observed (3)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (52)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
criminal law case ⓘ
juvenile justice case ⓘ
ageCategory juvenile offenders under 18 ⓘ
appliesTo federal criminal sentencing schemes ⓘ
state criminal sentencing schemes ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional law ⓘ
criminal sentencing ⓘ
juvenile justice ⓘ
citation 567 U.S. 460 ⓘ
citationStyle Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) ⓘ
linked to: Miller v. Alabama
constitutionalProvision Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
constitutionalRightProtected freedom from cruel and unusual punishments ⓘ
country United States of America ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 2012-06-25 ⓘ
decisionType landmark decision ⓘ
dissentingJustices Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ
docketNumber 10-9646 ⓘ
fullName Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) ⓘ
linked to: Miller v. Alabama
holding Mandatory life-without-parole schemes for juveniles are unconstitutional ⓘ
Mandatory life-without-parole sentences for juvenile offenders violate the Eighth Amendment ⓘ
Sentencers must have discretion to consider mitigating circumstances before imposing life without parole on juveniles ⓘ
impact invalidated mandatory juvenile life-without-parole statutes in multiple states ⓘ
jurisdiction United States ⓘ
legalIssue constitutionality of mandatory life without parole for juvenile offenders ⓘ
legalPrinciple children are constitutionally different from adults for sentencing purposes ⓘ
majorityJustices Anthony Kennedy ⓘ
linked to: Anthony M. Kennedy

Elena Kagan ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
Stephen Breyer ⓘ
linked to: Stephen G. Breyer
majorityOpinionBy Elena Kagan ⓘ
overruledOrLimited limited the use of life without parole for juveniles ⓘ
petitioner Evan Miller ⓘ
precedentOf Montgomery v. Louisiana ⓘ
relatedCase Graham v. Florida ⓘ
Montgomery v. Louisiana ⓘ
Roper v. Simmons ⓘ
relatedDoctrine cruel and unusual punishments ⓘ
proportionality in sentencing ⓘ
requires individualized sentencing for juveniles facing life without parole ⓘ
respondent State of Alabama ⓘ
linked to: Alabama
ruleAnnounced Mandatory life-without-parole sentences for offenders under 18 at the time of their crimes are unconstitutional ⓘ
sentencingSchemeAddressed mandatory life without parole ⓘ
subjectMatter juvenile homicide offenders ⓘ
voteSplit 5-4 ⓘ
yearDecided 2012 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (10)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Graham v. Florida → relatedCase → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ
Miller v. Alabama → fullName → Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) ⓘ
linked to: Miller v. Alabama
Miller v. Alabama → citationStyle → Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012) ⓘ
linked to: Miller v. Alabama
October Term 2011 → heardCase → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ
Montgomery v. Louisiana → holding → Miller v. Alabama announced a substantive rule of constitutional law that is retroactive on state collateral review. ⓘ
linked to: Miller v. Alabama
Montgomery v. Louisiana → relatedCase → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ
Evan Miller → notableFor → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ
Evan Miller → participantIn → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ
Evan Miller → caseNameAsParty → Miller v. Alabama ⓘ