Humphrey’s Executor v. United States

E192996

Humphrey’s Executor v. United States is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the president’s power to remove officials of independent regulatory agencies, reinforcing their insulation from direct executive control.

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
administrative law case ⓘ
separation of powers case ⓘ
appliesTo independent regulatory agencies ⓘ
officers with fixed terms and for-cause removal protections ⓘ
aroseFrom President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s attempt to remove FTC Commissioner William E. Humphrey ⓘ
concernsOffice Federal Trade Commission ⓘ
concernsOfficial FTC commissioner ⓘ
concernsPresident Franklin D. Roosevelt ⓘ
distinguishedFrom Myers v. United States ⓘ
hasChiefJustice Charles Evans Hughes ⓘ
hasCitation 295 U.S. 602 ⓘ
hasConstitutionalProvision Article II of the United States Constitution ⓘ
hasConstitutionalTheme checks and balances ⓘ
scope of executive power ⓘ
hasCountry United States ⓘ
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
hasDecisionDate May 27, 1935 ⓘ
hasDecisionType unanimous decision ⓘ
hasDecisionYear 1935 ⓘ
hasEra New Deal era ⓘ
linked to: New Deal
hasFullCaseName Humphrey’s Executor, Petitioner v. United States ⓘ
hasJurisdiction federal government of the United States ⓘ
hasLanguage English ⓘ
hasLegalIssue independence of regulatory commissions ⓘ
presidential removal power ⓘ
separation of powers between branches of government ⓘ
hasOpinionAuthor Charles Evans Hughes ⓘ
hasPetitioner Humphrey’s Executor ⓘ
hasRespondent United States ⓘ
hasStatuteInvolved Federal Trade Commission Act ⓘ
hasSubjectMatter administrative agencies ⓘ
public law ⓘ
hasVote 9–0 ⓘ
held Congress may limit the President’s power to remove officers of independent regulatory agencies to specified causes such as inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office. ⓘ
Members of certain independent regulatory commissions are not purely executive officers subject to at-will presidential removal. ⓘ
The Federal Trade Commission performs quasi-legislative and quasi-judicial functions and is not subject to full presidential control. ⓘ
The President may not remove a commissioner of an independent regulatory commission except for the causes specified by Congress in the statute creating the commission. ⓘ
isCitedIn Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ⓘ
Morrison v. Olson ⓘ
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau ⓘ
isKeyPrecedentFor cases on removal protections for independent agency officials ⓘ
modern administrative state structure ⓘ
limited Myers v. United States ⓘ
reinforcedDoctrine congressional power to create independent agencies insulated from direct presidential removal ⓘ
independence of administrative agencies ⓘ
resultedIn limitation on presidential power to remove members of independent commissions ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (9)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Tenure of Office Act → influencedDecision → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ⓘ
United States Supreme Court cases of the Hughes Court → includesCase → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ⓘ
Myers v. United States → laterLimitedBy → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ⓘ
Humphrey’s Executor v. United States → hasFullCaseName → Humphrey’s Executor, Petitioner v. United States ⓘ
linked to: Humphrey’s Executor v. United States
Bowsher v. Synar → isRelatedCase → Humphrey's Executor v. United States ⓘ
linked to: Humphrey’s Executor v. United States
Humphrey’s Executor → participatedIn → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ⓘ
Humphrey’s Executor → caseCitation → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935) ⓘ
linked to: Humphrey’s Executor v. United States
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau → relatedCase → Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ⓘ