Shelby County v. Holder

E15487

Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.

AI illustration

How this image was made

AI-generated illustration of Shelby County v. Holder

This AI-generated illustration was produced by black-forest-labs/FLUX.2-dev (1024x1024) from a prompt written by openai/gpt-oss-120b from the entity's label + description.

Prompt

Generate an image of Shelby County v. Holder (Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.)

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
constitutional law case ⓘ
voting rights case ⓘ
hasAreaOfLaw civil rights law ⓘ
election law ⓘ
federalism ⓘ
hasArgumentDate 2013-02-27 ⓘ
hasChiefJusticeInMajority John G. Roberts, Jr. ⓘ
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
hasCitation 570 U.S. 529 ⓘ
hasConstitutionalProvisionInvolved Article I, Section 4 of the United States Constitution ⓘ
Fifteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
hasCountry United States of America ⓘ
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
hasDecisionDate 2013-06-25 ⓘ
hasDissentingOpinionBy Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
hasDocketNumber No. 12-96 ⓘ
hasEffectOnStatute invalidated the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ⓘ
rendered Section 5 preclearance inoperative absent a new coverage formula ⓘ
hasHolding Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional ⓘ
coverage formula in Section 4(b) exceeds Congress’s power under the Constitution ⓘ
hasImpact limited the practical operation of the Voting Rights Act’s preclearance regime ⓘ
significantly weakened federal oversight of changes to state and local voting laws ⓘ
hasJusticeInDissent Elena Kagan ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
hasJusticeInMajority Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
Samuel A. Alito, Jr. ⓘ
linked to: Samuel A. Alito Jr.
hasKeyConcept coverage formula ⓘ
equal sovereignty of the states ⓘ
preclearance ⓘ
hasLegalIssue constitutionality of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ⓘ
scope of Congress’s enforcement power under the Fifteenth Amendment ⓘ
hasLocationOfOriginatingJurisdiction Shelby County, Alabama ⓘ
hasLowerCourt United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ⓘ
hasLowerCourtDecision upheld the constitutionality of Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act ⓘ
hasMajorityOpinionBy John G. Roberts, Jr. ⓘ
linked to: John G. Roberts Jr.
hasPetitioner Shelby County, Alabama ⓘ
hasRespondent Eric H. Holder, Jr. ⓘ
linked to: Eric Holder

United States Attorney General ⓘ
hasSectionInvolved Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ⓘ
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ⓘ
hasStatuteInvolved Voting Rights Act of 1965 ⓘ
hasTerm October Term 2012 ⓘ
hasVoteSplit 5–4 ⓘ
hasYearDecided 2013 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (29)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution → keyCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
subject linked to: Fourteenth Amendment
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund → notableCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Voting Rights Act of 1965 → landmarkCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Voting Rights Act of 1965 → affectedByCourtDecision → Shelby County v. Holder (2013) ⓘ
linked to: Shelby County v. Holder
Enforcement Clause → usedInCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. → notableCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Clarence Thomas → notableCaseInvolvement → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund → notableWork → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Sonia Sotomayor → notableCaseInvolvement → Shelby County v. Holder (dissenting views on voting rights) ⓘ
linked to: Shelby County v. Holder
VRA → relatedCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 → constitutionalChallenge → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
subject linked to: Section 4(b)
Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 → wasHeldUnconstitutionalInPartBy → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
subject linked to: Section 4(b)
South Carolina v. Katzenbach → isRelatedCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
October Term 2012 → includesCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
John G. Roberts Jr. → notableCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
subject linked to: John
Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act → relatedCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act → coverageFormulaInvalidatedIn → Shelby County v. Holder (2013) ⓘ
linked to: Shelby County v. Holder
United States Supreme Court cases → hasPart → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Donald B. Verrilli Jr. → notableCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
subject linked to: Donald B. Verrilli, Jr.
Fifteenth Amendment Enforcement Clause → usedInCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Voting Rights Act requirements → affectedBy → Shelby County v. Holder (2013) decision limiting coverage formula ⓘ
linked to: Shelby County v. Holder
Roberts Court → landmarkCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Paul Clement → notableCase → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ
Edward Blum → notableWork → Shelby County v. Holder ⓘ