substantial effects doctrine
E13968
The substantial effects doctrine is a constitutional law principle allowing Congress to regulate even local, non-commercial activity under the Commerce Clause if, in the aggregate, it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| substantial effects doctrine canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T125999 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: substantial effects doctrine Context triple: [Wickard v. Filburn, hasKeyDoctrine, substantial effects doctrine]
-
A.
Single Large Or Several Small debate
The Single Large Or Several Small (SLOSS) debate is a long-standing discussion in conservation biology over whether biodiversity is better preserved by one large protected area or by several smaller, separate reserves.
-
B.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1977 that encourages banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, particularly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
-
C.
Supplementary Provisions
Supplementary Provisions are the concluding section of the Constitution of Japan that contain transitional, implementation, and special clauses necessary for putting the main constitutional articles into effect.
-
D.
Supremacy Clause
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that establishes federal law and the Constitution as the highest law of the land, overriding conflicting state laws.
-
E.
USCP
USCP is the federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the U.S. Capitol complex, its members, staff, and visitors.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: substantial effects doctrine Target entity description: The substantial effects doctrine is a constitutional law principle allowing Congress to regulate even local, non-commercial activity under the Commerce Clause if, in the aggregate, it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
-
A.
Single Large Or Several Small debate
The Single Large Or Several Small (SLOSS) debate is a long-standing discussion in conservation biology over whether biodiversity is better preserved by one large protected area or by several smaller, separate reserves.
-
B.
Community Reinvestment Act
The Community Reinvestment Act is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1977 that encourages banks to help meet the credit needs of the communities in which they operate, particularly low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
-
C.
Supplementary Provisions
Supplementary Provisions are the concluding section of the Constitution of Japan that contain transitional, implementation, and special clauses necessary for putting the main constitutional articles into effect.
-
D.
Supremacy Clause
The Supremacy Clause is a provision in the U.S. Constitution that establishes federal law and the Constitution as the highest law of the land, overriding conflicting state laws.
-
E.
USCP
USCP is the federal law enforcement agency responsible for protecting the U.S. Capitol complex, its members, staff, and visitors.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (44)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States constitutional law concept
ⓘ
constitutional law doctrine ⓘ legal doctrine ⓘ |
| allows |
Congress to regulate intrastate activity
ⓘ
Congress to regulate local activity ⓘ Congress to regulate non-commercial activity ⓘ |
| appliedBy | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| appliesTo | Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| associatedWith |
New Deal era constitutional jurisprudence
ⓘ
linked to:
United States constitutional history
|
| basedOn | aggregation principle ⓘ |
| citedInCase |
Gonzales v. Raich
ⓘ
Wickard v. Filburn ⓘ |
| condition | regulated activity must have substantial effect on interstate commerce in the aggregate ⓘ |
| connectedTo |
enumerated powers of Congress
ⓘ
limits on federal police power ⓘ |
| controversialFor | broad interpretation of Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| criticizedFor |
eroding limits on federal power
ⓘ
weakening state sovereignty ⓘ |
| developedInCase |
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
ⓘ
Wickard v. Filburn ⓘ |
| distinguishedFrom |
channels of interstate commerce doctrine
ⓘ
instrumentalities of interstate commerce doctrine ⓘ |
| expandedFederalPowerOver |
agricultural production
ⓘ
economic regulation ⓘ labor relations ⓘ local economic activity ⓘ |
| influences | federalism debates in the United States ⓘ |
| interprets | scope of congressional commerce power ⓘ |
| involvesQuestion | what constitutes economic activity ⓘ |
| legalSystem |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| limitedByCase |
United States v. Lopez
ⓘ
United States v. Morrison ⓘ |
| relatedConcept |
aggregation of effects
ⓘ
economic activity requirement ⓘ rational basis review in Commerce Clause cases ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
Necessary and Proper Clause
ⓘ
interstate commerce ⓘ |
| requiresFinding | substantial effect on interstate commerce ⓘ |
| sourceOf | broad congressional regulatory authority over national markets ⓘ |
| subjectOf | scholarly debate in constitutional law ⓘ |
| supportsView | Congress may regulate intrastate activity that is part of a class of activities affecting interstate commerce ⓘ |
| timePeriod | 20th century ⓘ |
| usedToUphold |
federal regulation of homegrown medical marijuana in Gonzales v. Raich
ⓘ
federal regulation of homegrown wheat in Wickard v. Filburn ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: substantial effects doctrine Description of subject: The substantial effects doctrine is a constitutional law principle allowing Congress to regulate even local, non-commercial activity under the Commerce Clause if, in the aggregate, it exerts a substantial effect on interstate commerce.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.