Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
E137684
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe canonical | 3 |
| landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T1202378 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe Context triple: [Overton Park, notableEvent, Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe]
-
A.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
B.
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the standard for proving discriminatory intent in equal protection challenges to facially neutral government actions, particularly in the context of zoning and housing discrimination.
-
C.
National League of Cities v. Usery
National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
-
D.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
-
E.
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie is a landmark 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the First Amendment rights of a neo-Nazi group to march in a predominantly Jewish community despite widespread opposition.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe Target entity description: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
-
A.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
B.
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the standard for proving discriminatory intent in equal protection challenges to facially neutral government actions, particularly in the context of zoning and housing discrimination.
-
C.
National League of Cities v. Usery
National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
-
D.
County of Allegheny v. ACLU
County of Allegheny v. ACLU is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that refined the interpretation of the Establishment Clause by addressing the constitutionality of religious holiday displays on government property.
-
E.
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of Skokie is a landmark 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the First Amendment rights of a neo-Nazi group to march in a predominantly Jewish community despite widespread opposition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark administrative law case ⓘ |
| clarifiesConcept |
limits on post hoc rationalizations by agencies
ⓘ
requirement for contemporaneous administrative record ⓘ scope of judicial review of informal agency action ⓘ |
| concernsStatute |
Section 138 of Title 23 of the United States Code
ⓘ
Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 ⓘ |
| hasChiefJustice | Warren E. Burger ⓘ |
| hasCitation | 401 U.S. 402 ⓘ |
| hasConcurrenceAuthor |
Byron R. White
ⓘ
Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ Hugo L. Black ⓘ Potter Stewart ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ William O. Douglas ⓘ |
| hasCountry |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasDecision | judgment of the Court of Appeals vacated and case remanded ⓘ |
| hasDecisionDate | 1971-03-02 ⓘ |
| hasDissentAuthor |
Harry A. Blackmun
ⓘ
John M. Harlan II ⓘ Warren E. Burger ⓘ |
| hasDocketNumber | No. 89 ⓘ |
| hasHolding |
administrative decisions are subject to judicial review under the arbitrary and capricious standard
ⓘ
federal courts may review the Secretary of Transportation’s decision to route a highway through a public park ⓘ the Secretary of Transportation must show that there are no feasible and prudent alternatives to using parkland for highway construction ⓘ |
| hasImpact |
became a foundational precedent in U.S. administrative law
ⓘ
influenced later environmental and transportation planning litigation ⓘ limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highways through public parks ⓘ strengthened judicial oversight of administrative agencies ⓘ |
| hasLegalArea |
administrative law
ⓘ
environmental law ⓘ transportation law ⓘ |
| hasMajorityAuthor | Thurgood Marshall ⓘ |
| hasPetitioner | Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. ⓘ |
| hasProceduralHistory | review of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ⓘ |
| hasRespondent | John A. Volpe ⓘ |
| hasRespondentRole | United States Secretary of Transportation ⓘ |
| hasStandardOfReview |
arbitrary and capricious
ⓘ
hard look review ⓘ |
| involvesCity |
Memphis, Tennessee
ⓘ
linked to:
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
|
| involvesIssue | construction of Interstate 40 through a public park ⓘ |
| involvesLocation | Overton Park ⓘ |
| involvesPartyType |
citizen environmental group
ⓘ
federal transportation officials ⓘ |
| isTaughtIn |
U.S. law school administrative law courses
ⓘ
U.S. law school environmental law courses ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe Description of subject: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited federal agencies’ discretion in approving highway construction through public parks and strengthened judicial review of administrative decisions.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC
→
relatedCase
→
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
ⓘ
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc.
→
notableFor
→
landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe
ⓘ
linked to: Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. Volpe