Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida

E114954

Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that significantly limited Congress’s power to subject non-consenting states to lawsuits in federal court, reinforcing state sovereign immunity.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (50)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ
United States constitutional law case ⓘ
federal courts case ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional law ⓘ
federal Indian law ⓘ
federal courts ⓘ
arguedDate 1995-10-11 ⓘ
chiefJusticeAtDecision William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
citation 517 U.S. 44 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article I, Section 8, Indian Commerce Clause ⓘ
Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1996-03-27 ⓘ
decisionType 5–4 decision ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy David H. Souter ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ
docketNumber 94-12 ⓘ
fullName Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
holding Congress lacks power under Article I to abrogate state sovereign immunity from suits by private parties in federal court ⓘ
The Eleventh Amendment bars suits in federal court by an Indian tribe against a non-consenting state to enforce IGRA ⓘ
The Indian Commerce Clause does not authorize Congress to subject non-consenting states to suits by Indian tribes in federal court ⓘ
impact restricted enforcement mechanisms available to Indian tribes under IGRA ⓘ
significantly limited Congress’s ability to authorize private suits against non-consenting states under Article I powers ⓘ
strengthened state sovereign immunity doctrine in federal courts ⓘ
joinedByInMajority Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction ⓘ
legalIssue Article I powers of Congress ⓘ
Eleventh Amendment ⓘ
Indian Commerce Clause ⓘ
federal jurisdiction over non-consenting states ⓘ
state sovereign immunity ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy William H. Rehnquist ⓘ
overruledPrecedent Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. ⓘ
page 44 ⓘ
petitioner Seminole Tribe of Florida ⓘ
linked to: Seminole
precedentStatus leading case on state sovereign immunity ⓘ
relatedDoctrine Ex parte Young doctrine ⓘ
linked to: Ex parte Young
reporter United States Reports ⓘ
respondent State of Florida ⓘ
linked to: Florida
shortName Seminole Tribe ⓘ
linked to: Seminole
statuteInvolved 28 U.S.C. § 1362 ⓘ
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act ⓘ
subsequentCitationFrequency frequently cited in later sovereign immunity cases ⓘ
volume 517 ⓘ
year 1996 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (14)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution → keyCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Chisholm v. Georgia (Supreme Court decision) → relatedCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Hans v. Louisiana → isCitedBy → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida → fullName → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Alden v. Maine → relatedCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
United States sovereign immunity law → keyCase → Seminole Tribe v. Florida ⓘ
linked to: Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
Ex parte Young → relatedCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Rehnquist Court → landmarkDecision → Seminole Tribe v. Florida ⓘ
linked to: Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court → significantCase → Seminole Tribe v. Florida ⓘ
linked to: Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida
Indian Commerce Clause → citedInCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co. → overruledBy → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents → relatedCase → Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida ⓘ