Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982) | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)]

Target entity: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)]

• A. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• B. Texas v. New Mexico
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• C. Colorado Department of State v. Baca
  Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
• D. Kleppe v. New Mexico
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• E. Arizona v. United States
  Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"

Entity: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
Triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)]

Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.

Target entity: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
Target entity description: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.

• A. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• B. Texas v. New Mexico
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• C. Colorado Department of State v. Baca
  Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
• D. Kleppe v. New Mexico
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• E. Arizona v. United States
  Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
• F. None of above. chosen