Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)
E1403688
UNEXPLORED
Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982) canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T19961441 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982) Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982)]
-
A.
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
-
B.
Texas v. New Mexico
Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
-
C.
Colorado Department of State v. Baca
Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
-
D.
Kleppe v. New Mexico
Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
-
E.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982) Target entity description: Colorado v. New Mexico, 459 U.S. 176 (1982), is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing an interstate water rights dispute over the apportionment of the Vermejo River between Colorado and New Mexico.
-
A.
Bullcoming v. New Mexico
Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
-
B.
Texas v. New Mexico
Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
-
C.
Colorado Department of State v. Baca
Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
-
D.
Kleppe v. New Mexico
Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
-
E.
Arizona v. United States
Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
- F. None of above. chosen
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.