Bailey v. Alabama

Target entity: Bailey v. Alabama
Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the White Court, hasNotableCase, Bailey v. Alabama]

• A. Swain v. Alabama
  Swain v. Alabama was a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set a high evidentiary bar for proving racial discrimination in jury selection, later overturned by Batson v. Kentucky.
• B. Powell v. Alabama
  Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
• C. Hamilton v. Alabama
  Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.
• D. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
  J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
• E. Stone v. Mississippi
  Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Bailey v. Alabama
Target entity description: Bailey v. Alabama is a 1911 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law effectively criminalizing breach of labor contracts, holding that it violated the Thirteenth Amendment’s prohibition of involuntary servitude.

• A. Swain v. Alabama
  Swain v. Alabama was a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set a high evidentiary bar for proving racial discrimination in jury selection, later overturned by Batson v. Kentucky.
• B. Powell v. Alabama
  Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
• C. Hamilton v. Alabama
  Hamilton v. Alabama is a 1961 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held an indigent defendant in a capital case has a constitutional right to counsel at arraignment, treating that stage as a critical point in the criminal process.
• D. J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B.
  J.E.B. v. Alabama ex rel. T.B. is a 1994 U.S. Supreme Court case that held peremptory jury strikes based solely on gender violate the Equal Protection Clause.
• E. Stone v. Mississippi
  Stone v. Mississippi is an 1880 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a state cannot irrevocably surrender its police power, allowing Mississippi to prohibit a previously chartered lottery despite contractual claims.
• F. None of above. chosen