Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
E87160
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstić | 3 |
| Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) canonical | 2 |
| Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY, 2001) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T663961 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) Context triple: [Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, citedInCase, Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)]
-
A.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia was a UN court established to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
-
B.
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is the landmark International Criminal Court case in which Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga was tried and convicted for the war crime of enlisting and conscripting child soldiers.
-
C.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a UN-established court mandated to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda in 1994.
-
D.
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
-
E.
State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a short-lived South Slavic state established in 1918 from former Austro-Hungarian territories, which soon united with the Kingdom of Serbia to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia).
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) Target entity description: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
-
A.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia
The International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia was a UN court established to prosecute individuals responsible for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide committed during the conflicts in the Balkans in the 1990s.
-
B.
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo
Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo is the landmark International Criminal Court case in which Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga was tried and convicted for the war crime of enlisting and conscripting child soldiers.
-
C.
International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda
The International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda was a UN-established court mandated to prosecute individuals responsible for genocide and other serious violations of international humanitarian law committed in Rwanda in 1994.
-
D.
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015)
Croatia v. Serbia (ICJ, 2015) is a landmark International Court of Justice case in which the Court adjudicated mutual genocide claims arising from the 1990s Yugoslav wars and clarified key aspects of state responsibility under the Genocide Convention.
-
E.
State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs
The State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs was a short-lived South Slavic state established in 1918 from former Austro-Hungarian territories, which soon united with the Kingdom of Serbia to form the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia).
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (66)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
ICTY case
ⓘ
genocide case ⓘ international criminal case ⓘ war crimes trial ⓘ |
| appealOutcome | partially upheld and partially revised by the Appeals Chamber ⓘ |
| appealsChamber | Appeals Chamber of the ICTY ⓘ |
| applicableLaw |
Geneva Conventions and their customary rules
ⓘ
linked to:
Geneva Conventions
customary international law on genocide ⓘ |
| armedConflictContext |
Bosnian War
ⓘ
conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina 1992–1995 ⓘ |
| chamber | Trial Chamber I of the ICTY ⓘ |
| charge |
complicity in genocide
ⓘ
deportation as a crime against humanity ⓘ extermination as a crime against humanity ⓘ genocide ⓘ inhumane acts as a crime against humanity ⓘ murder as a crime against humanity ⓘ murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war ⓘ persecutions as a crime against humanity ⓘ |
| clarifiedConcept |
actus reus of genocide
ⓘ
mens rea for genocide ⓘ protected groups under the Genocide Convention ⓘ relationship between ethnic cleansing and genocide ⓘ |
| conviction |
aiding and abetting genocide
ⓘ
deportation as a crime against humanity ⓘ extermination as a crime against humanity ⓘ genocide ⓘ inhumane acts as a crime against humanity ⓘ murder as a crime against humanity ⓘ murder as a violation of the laws or customs of war ⓘ persecutions as a crime against humanity ⓘ |
| court | International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ⓘ |
| crimeQualifiedAs | genocide at Srebrenica ⓘ |
| defendant | Radislav Krstić ⓘ |
| finding |
Bosnian Muslim men and boys of Srebrenica were a protected group under the Genocide Convention
ⓘ
Srebrenica massacre constituted genocide ⓘ
linked to:
Srebrenica genocide
forcible transfer of women, children and elderly was part of the genocidal operation ⓘ intent to destroy the Bosnian Muslim community of Srebrenica in part ⓘ mass executions of Bosnian Muslim men and boys around Srebrenica in July 1995 ⓘ subsequent reburials to conceal the crimes ⓘ systematic killing and burial in mass graves ⓘ |
| fullName |
Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstić
ⓘ
linked to:
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
|
| influenced |
jurisprudence of other international criminal courts and tribunals
ⓘ
subsequent ICTY Srebrenica-related cases ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
international criminal law
ⓘ
war crimes in the former Yugoslavia ⓘ |
| legalBasis |
Article 4 of the ICTY Statute
ⓘ
Genocide Convention of 1948 ⓘ
linked to:
GenocideConvention1948
ICTY Statute ⓘ |
| legalSignificance |
cited by the International Court of Justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro
ⓘ
clarified modes of liability for genocide including aiding and abetting ⓘ clarified the concept of destruction of a group in part ⓘ clarified the notion of a substantial part of a protected group ⓘ clarified the standard of specific intent for genocide ⓘ first ICTY judgment to characterize Srebrenica events as genocide ⓘ influential precedent for later international criminal tribunals ⓘ landmark case on the definition of genocide ⓘ |
| locationOfCrimes |
Srebrenica
ⓘ
linked to:
Srebrenica genocide
eastern Bosnia and Herzegovina ⓘ
linked to:
Republika Srpska
|
| prosecutor | Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia ⓘ |
| relatedEvent |
Srebrenica genocide
ⓘ
fall of the Srebrenica enclave in July 1995 ⓘ |
| sentenceType | term of imprisonment ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
crimes against humanity
ⓘ
genocide ⓘ violations of the laws or customs of war ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) Description of subject: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY) is a landmark judgment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia that established the Srebrenica massacre as an act of genocide and clarified key legal standards for prosecuting genocide under international law.
Referenced by (6)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Article II of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
→
citedInCase
→
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
ⓘ
subject linked to:
Article II
linked to: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
linked to: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
linked to: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
linked to: Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia as party to the conflict
→
clarifiedIn
→
Prosecutor v. Krstić (ICTY)
ⓘ