law of excluded middle

E838588

The law of excluded middle is a classical logical principle stating that every proposition is either true or false, with no third option, and is central to debates between classical and intuitionistic logic.

All labels observed (2)

Label Occurrences
law of excluded middle canonical 2
law of non-contradiction 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf classical logic principle ⓘ
law of logic ⓘ
logical principle ⓘ
denies the existence of a third truth value between truth and falsity ⓘ
formulatedAs P ∨ ¬P ⓘ
hasAlternativeName LEM ⓘ
no third is given ⓘ
principle of excluded middle ⓘ
tertium non datur ⓘ
hasConsequence every statement is either true or its negation is true ⓘ
there are no truth-value gaps in classical logic ⓘ
hasDomain first-order logic ⓘ
propositional logic ⓘ
hasHistoricalRootIn Aristotelian logic ⓘ
implies principle of bivalence in classical settings ⓘ
isAcceptedIn Boolean logic ⓘ
classical logic ⓘ
standard first-order logic ⓘ
standard propositional logic ⓘ
isCentralTo classical logic ⓘ
isCentralToDebateBetween classical logic and intuitionistic logic ⓘ
isContestedIn constructivism ⓘ
intuitionism ⓘ
philosophy of mathematics ⓘ
isDistinctFrom law of non-contradiction ⓘ
isEquivalentToInClassicalLogic ¬P → (P → Q) ⓘ
¬¬P → P ⓘ
isFormalizedIn Hilbert-style proof systems ⓘ
sequent calculi for classical logic ⓘ
isNotGenerallyValidIn fuzzy logic ⓘ
many-valued logics ⓘ
paraconsistent logics ⓘ
topos-theoretic internal logics ⓘ
isOmittedFrom axiomatizations of intuitionistic logic ⓘ
isRejectedIn constructive mathematics ⓘ
intuitionistic logic ⓘ
linked to: intuitionism
isRelatedTo double negation elimination ⓘ
non-contradiction ⓘ
principle of bivalence ⓘ
isUsedIn classical analysis ⓘ
classical proofs by contradiction ⓘ
classical set theory ⓘ
non-constructive existence proofs ⓘ
states every proposition is either true or false ⓘ
for any proposition P, either P is true or its negation ¬P is true ⓘ
wasCriticizedBy L. E. J. Brouwer ⓘ
wasDefendedBy David Hilbert ⓘ
wasDiscussedBy Aristotle ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (3)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Hilbert–Brouwer controversy → about → law of excluded middle ⓘ
law of excluded middle → isDistinctFrom → law of non-contradiction ⓘ
linked to: law of excluded middle
Negation → hasLogicalLaw → law of excluded middle ⓘ