Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress
E771476
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters consider the poorest supporting actress performances in a given year.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress canonical | 2 |
| Razzie for Worst Supporting Actress | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T8766552 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress Context triple: [Jack and Jill, award, Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress]
-
A.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress is a satirical film award given annually to recognize what voters consider the poorest performance by a lead actress in a given year.
-
B.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor is a satirical film award presented annually to dishonor what voters consider the poorest supporting male acting performance in a given year.
-
C.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor is a satirical film award presented annually to recognize what voters consider the poorest performance by a male lead in a given year.
-
D.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Ensemble
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Ensemble is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters deem the most poorly performing or mismatched group of actors in a given year.
-
E.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters deem the most painfully mismatched or poorly performing on-screen pair in a given year.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress Target entity description: The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters consider the poorest supporting actress performances in a given year.
-
A.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress is a satirical film award given annually to recognize what voters consider the poorest performance by a lead actress in a given year.
-
B.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor is a satirical film award presented annually to dishonor what voters consider the poorest supporting male acting performance in a given year.
-
C.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor is a satirical film award presented annually to recognize what voters consider the poorest performance by a male lead in a given year.
-
D.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Ensemble
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Ensemble is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters deem the most poorly performing or mismatched group of actors in a given year.
-
E.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple
The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Screen Couple is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters deem the most painfully mismatched or poorly performing on-screen pair in a given year.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress Description of subject: The Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress is a satirical film award dishonoring what voters consider the poorest supporting actress performances in a given year.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actress
→
hasCategory
→
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress
ⓘ
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress
→
shortName
→
Razzie for Worst Supporting Actress
ⓘ
linked to: Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actress