Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon

E666850

De Jonge v. Oregon is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot criminalize peaceful assembly and political association, reinforcing First Amendment protections through the Fourteenth Amendment.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case
landmark First Amendment case
person
activityLeadingToArrest speaking at a peaceful public meeting in Portland, Oregon
areaOfLaw First Amendment law
civil liberties
constitutional law
citation 299 U.S. 353
constitutionalProvision First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
convictedUnder Oregon criminal syndicalism statute
convictionStatusAfterAppeal reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in De Jonge v. Oregon
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1937-01-04
doctrine First Amendment freedoms are fundamental and safeguarded by the Fourteenth Amendment from state infringement
factPattern Dirk De Jonge was arrested and convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon
fullName Dirk De Jonge v. State of Oregon
linked to: De Jonge v. Oregon
historicalContext Red Scare–era criminal syndicalism prosecutions
holding Participation in a peaceful public meeting called by the Communist Party cannot be punished under a criminal syndicalism statute solely because of the party’s advocacy
States cannot criminalize peaceful assembly for lawful discussion, even if held under the auspices of a political party such as the Communist Party
The right of peaceable assembly is a fundamental right protected against state infringement by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
jurisdiction United States
legalIssue freedom of assembly
freedom of speech
incorporation of the First Amendment
locationOfEvents Portland, Oregon
linked to: Portland
meetingOrganizer Communist Party
opinionBy Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes
overturnedLaw application of Oregon’s criminal syndicalism statute to peaceful assembly
petitioner Dirk De Jonge
precedentFor incorporation of freedom of assembly against the states
limits on state criminal syndicalism laws
protection of peaceful political meetings from state suppression
relatedCase Gitlow v. New York
Hague v. CIO
Stromberg v. California
Whitney v. California
relatedRight freedom of expression
right to peaceable assembly
right to political association
respondent State of Oregon
linked to: Oregon
resultForPetitioner conviction reversed
roleInCase petitioner in De Jonge v. Oregon
stateInvolved Oregon
vote unanimous decision
yearDecided 1937

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

De Jonge v. Oregon factualBackground Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon
De Jonge v. Oregon factPattern Dirk De Jonge was arrested and convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon
linked to: Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon