Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon

E666850

De Jonge v. Oregon is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court case that held states cannot criminalize peaceful assembly and political association, reinforcing First Amendment protections through the Fourteenth Amendment.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ
landmark First Amendment case ⓘ
person ⓘ
activityLeadingToArrest speaking at a peaceful public meeting in Portland, Oregon ⓘ
areaOfLaw First Amendment law ⓘ
civil liberties ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
citation 299 U.S. 353 ⓘ
constitutionalProvision First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
convictedUnder Oregon criminal syndicalism statute ⓘ
convictionStatusAfterAppeal reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court in De Jonge v. Oregon ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1937-01-04 ⓘ
doctrine First Amendment freedoms are fundamental and safeguarded by the Fourteenth Amendment from state infringement ⓘ
factPattern Dirk De Jonge was arrested and convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon ⓘ
fullName Dirk De Jonge v. State of Oregon ⓘ
linked to: De Jonge v. Oregon
historicalContext Red Scare–era criminal syndicalism prosecutions ⓘ
holding Participation in a peaceful public meeting called by the Communist Party cannot be punished under a criminal syndicalism statute solely because of the party’s advocacy ⓘ
States cannot criminalize peaceful assembly for lawful discussion, even if held under the auspices of a political party such as the Communist Party ⓘ
The right of peaceable assembly is a fundamental right protected against state infringement by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
jurisdiction United States ⓘ
legalIssue freedom of assembly ⓘ
freedom of speech ⓘ
incorporation of the First Amendment ⓘ
locationOfEvents Portland, Oregon ⓘ
linked to: Portland
meetingOrganizer Communist Party ⓘ
opinionBy Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes ⓘ
overturnedLaw application of Oregon’s criminal syndicalism statute to peaceful assembly ⓘ
petitioner Dirk De Jonge ⓘ
precedentFor incorporation of freedom of assembly against the states ⓘ
limits on state criminal syndicalism laws ⓘ
protection of peaceful political meetings from state suppression ⓘ
relatedCase Gitlow v. New York ⓘ
Hague v. CIO ⓘ
Stromberg v. California ⓘ
Whitney v. California ⓘ
relatedRight freedom of expression ⓘ
right to peaceable assembly ⓘ
right to political association ⓘ
respondent State of Oregon ⓘ
linked to: Oregon
resultForPetitioner conviction reversed ⓘ
roleInCase petitioner in De Jonge v. Oregon ⓘ
stateInvolved Oregon ⓘ
vote unanimous decision ⓘ
yearDecided 1937 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

De Jonge v. Oregon → factualBackground → Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon ⓘ
De Jonge v. Oregon → factPattern → Dirk De Jonge was arrested and convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon ⓘ
linked to: Dirk De Jonge was convicted for speaking at a peaceful public meeting held under the auspices of the Communist Party in Portland, Oregon