George H. Eldridge

E660010

George H. Eldridge was the disability benefits claimant whose challenge to due process protections in benefit termination proceedings led to the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Mathews v. Eldridge.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
George H. Eldridge canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (25)

Predicate Object
instanceOf disability benefits claimant ⓘ
person ⓘ
assertedRight procedural due process under the Fifth Amendment ⓘ
associatedWithLegalDoctrine Mathews balancing test for procedural due process ⓘ
linked to: Mathews v. Eldridge
benefitTypeInDispute Social Security disability insurance benefits ⓘ
caseOutcomeForClaimant U.S. Supreme Court held that pre-termination evidentiary hearing was not required ⓘ
challengedProcedure termination of disability benefits without pre-termination evidentiary hearing ⓘ
countryOfCitizenship United States ⓘ
governmentActionChallenged administrative termination of disability benefits based on written medical reports ⓘ
historicalSignificance central figure in a landmark U.S. Supreme Court due process case on benefit termination ⓘ
impactOnLaw helped define standards for what process is due before government benefit termination ⓘ
involvedInCourtCase Mathews v. Eldridge ⓘ
legalContext Social Security law ⓘ
linked to: Social Security

administrative law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
legalIssueRaised due process protections in termination of disability benefits ⓘ
requirement of evidentiary hearing before termination of Social Security disability benefits ⓘ
notableFor being the claimant in Mathews v. Eldridge ⓘ
occupation disability benefits recipient (at time of litigation) ⓘ
opposedPartyInCase F. David Mathews, Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare ⓘ
partyTo Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976) ⓘ
linked to: Mathews v. Eldridge
proceduralPosture challenged constitutionality of administrative procedures for benefit termination ⓘ
propertyInterestClaimed continued receipt of Social Security disability benefits ⓘ
rightInvoked right to notice and opportunity to be heard before deprivation of property interest in benefits ⓘ
roleInCourtCase respondent in Mathews v. Eldridge ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Mathews v. Eldridge → respondent → George H. Eldridge ⓘ