D & C Builders Ltd v Rees

E590299

D & C Builders Ltd v Rees is a leading English contract law case, best known for Lord Denning’s judgment on economic duress and the enforceability of part-payment settlements.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
D & C Builders Ltd v Rees canonical 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Court of Appeal of England and Wales decision ⓘ
English contract law case ⓘ
appliesPrecedent Foakes v Beer ⓘ
clarifies limits of promissory estoppel where there is unfair pressure ⓘ
that estoppel is an equitable doctrine requiring clean hands ⓘ
concerns part payment of an undisputed debt ⓘ
settlement obtained under pressure ⓘ
hasAreaOfLaw accord and satisfaction ⓘ
contract law ⓘ
economic duress ⓘ
part payment of debt ⓘ
hasClaimant D & C Builders Ltd ⓘ
hasCourt Court of Appeal of England and Wales ⓘ
hasDefendant Mr Rees ⓘ
Mrs Rees ⓘ
hasJudge Danckwerts LJ ⓘ
Lord Denning MR ⓘ
linked to: Lord Denning

Winn LJ ⓘ
hasKeyConcept consideration ⓘ
economic duress ⓘ
inequitable conduct ⓘ
promissory estoppel ⓘ
hasLeadingJudgmentBy Lord Denning MR ⓘ
linked to: Lord Denning
hasLegalSystem common law ⓘ
holds a creditor is not bound by a part-payment settlement obtained by improper pressure ⓘ
a promise to accept less than the full debt is not binding without consideration unless protected by equity ⓘ
equity will not assist a debtor who uses unfair pressure to secure a reduction ⓘ
involvesParty D & C Builders Ltd ⓘ
Mr Rees ⓘ
Mrs Rees ⓘ
isFrequentlyCitedIn English contract law textbooks ⓘ
cases on economic duress ⓘ
cases on part payment of debt ⓘ
isLeadingCaseOn application of Foakes v Beer ⓘ
economic duress in contract law ⓘ
enforceability of part-payment settlements ⓘ
isReferencedAsAuthorityFor economic duress undermining apparent agreement ⓘ
non-enforceability of part-payment settlements obtained by improper threats ⓘ
isTaughtIn university contract law courses in the United Kingdom ⓘ
jurisdiction England and Wales ⓘ
language English ⓘ
supportsPrinciple a debtor cannot rely on estoppel when the creditor’s promise was obtained by intimidation or unfair pressure ⓘ
equity may prevent a creditor from going back on a promise to accept less, if it is truly voluntary and not induced by duress ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Lord Denning → notableWork → D & C Builders Ltd v Rees ⓘ