Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
E479821
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors canonical | 1 |
| Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T4892188 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors Context triple: [Compact Clause of the United States Constitution, appliedInCase, Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors]
-
A.
United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
-
B.
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
-
C.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
D.
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
E.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal income tax as unconstitutional, prompting the later adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to authorize such taxes.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors Target entity description: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
-
A.
United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey
United States Trust Co. v. New Jersey is a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the limits of state power to impair public contracts under the Constitution’s Contract Clause.
-
B.
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is a 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that first recognized workplace sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination actionable under Title VII.
-
C.
Northern Securities Co. v. United States
Northern Securities Co. v. United States was a landmark 1904 U.S. Supreme Court antitrust case that broke up a major railroad holding company and strengthened federal power to regulate monopolies under the Sherman Act.
-
D.
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union is a 1989 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowly interpreted federal employment discrimination protections, prompting Congress to expand and clarify those rights in the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
-
E.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. was an 1895 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a federal income tax as unconstitutional, prompting the later adoption of the Sixteenth Amendment to authorize such taxes.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (36)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
United States constitutional law case ⓘ legal case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
interstate compacts
ⓘ
regulation of interstate banking ⓘ |
| citation | 472 U.S. 159 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Article I, Section 10, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
Compact Clause of the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1985 ⓘ |
| decisionType | majority opinion ⓘ |
| firstPage | 159 ⓘ |
| fullName | Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ⓘ |
| holding |
regional interstate banking arrangements at issue did not constitute an unconstitutional interstate compact under the Compact Clause
ⓘ
state regional banking statutes at issue were not preempted by federal banking law ⓘ |
| impact |
clarified when interstate arrangements among states require congressional consent under the Compact Clause
ⓘ
confirmed that certain regional banking reciprocity statutes are compatible with federal banking regulation ⓘ |
| issue |
whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Compact Clause of the U.S. Constitution
ⓘ
whether regional interstate banking compacts conflicted with federal banking statutes ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
Compact Clause
ⓘ
banking law ⓘ constitutional law ⓘ federal preemption ⓘ interstate banking ⓘ |
| petitioner | Northeast Bancorp, Inc. ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
cases involving state regulation of interstate banking consistent with federal law
ⓘ
cases involving the scope of the Compact Clause ⓘ |
| relatedTo |
regional banking compacts among New England states
ⓘ
state statutes authorizing reciprocal interstate bank acquisitions within a region ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent |
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
ⓘ
linked to:
Federal Reserve Board of Governors
|
| result | state regional banking statutes were upheld ⓘ |
| timePeriod | 20th century ⓘ |
| volume | 472 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors Description of subject: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
Referenced by (2)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Compact Clause of the United States Constitution
→
appliedInCase
→
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
ⓘ
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
→
fullName
→
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
ⓘ
linked to: Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors