Breedlove v. Suttles

E421913

Breedlove v. Suttles was a 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state poll taxes as constitutional, reinforcing barriers to voting until later overturned during the civil rights era.

All labels observed (2)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
court decision ⓘ
areaOfLaw civil rights law ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
election law ⓘ
citation 302 U.S. 277 ⓘ
58 S. Ct. 205 ⓘ
82 L. Ed. 252 ⓘ
civilRightsEraSignificance example of pre–civil rights era Supreme Court deference to discriminatory voting laws ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Equal Protection Clause ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States of America ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1937-12-06 ⓘ
decisionType unanimous decision ⓘ
effectOnLaw validated state authority to impose poll taxes before the Twenty-Fourth Amendment ⓘ
fullName Nolan Breedlove v. S. Guyt McCall, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia, et al., substituted by Suttles ⓘ
historicalContext Jim Crow era voting restrictions in the American South ⓘ
holding Georgia’s poll tax requirement was upheld as constitutional ⓘ
state poll taxes as a prerequisite to voting do not violate the U.S. Constitution ⓘ
impact provided constitutional support for Jim Crow–era voting restrictions ⓘ
reinforced barriers to voting for poor and minority citizens ⓘ
upheld use of poll taxes in state elections ⓘ
jurisdiction United States federal government ⓘ
languageOfDecision English ⓘ
laterOverruledBy Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections ⓘ
legalIssue constitutionality of state poll tax ⓘ
voting rights and poll tax ⓘ
legalSystem common law ⓘ
originatingState Georgia ⓘ
overrulingDate 1966 ⓘ
petitioner Nolan Breedlove ⓘ
precedentialStatus binding precedent until overruled ⓘ
publication United States Reports ⓘ
relatedTo Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections ⓘ
Twenty-Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
respondent Suttles, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia ⓘ
shortName Breedlove v. Suttles ⓘ
stateLawInvolved Georgia poll tax law ⓘ
subjectMatter poll tax ⓘ
voter qualification ⓘ
subsequentDevelopment poll taxes in federal elections prohibited by the Twenty-Fourth Amendment ⓘ
poll taxes in state elections held unconstitutional in Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections ⓘ
term October Term 1937 ⓘ
timePeriod interwar period in United States history ⓘ
voteRequirementAddressed payment of poll tax as condition to vote ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (4)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

383 U.S. 663 → overruledPrecedent → Breedlove v. Suttles ⓘ
Breedlove v. Suttles → fullName → Nolan Breedlove v. S. Guyt McCall, Tax Collector of Fulton County, Georgia, et al., substituted by Suttles ⓘ
linked to: Breedlove v. Suttles
Breedlove v. Suttles → shortName → Breedlove v. Suttles ⓘ