Mitchell v. United States
E373214
Mitchell v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the scope of Fifth Amendment protections, particularly concerning a defendant’s right against self-incrimination at sentencing.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Mitchell v. United States canonical | 3 |
| Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3615232 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mitchell v. United States Context triple: [Boynton v. Virginia, relatedCase, Mitchell v. United States]
-
A.
United Public Workers v. Mitchell
United Public Workers v. Mitchell is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on federal employees’ political activities.
-
B.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Abrams v. United States
Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
-
E.
Oregon v. Mitchell
Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Mitchell v. United States Target entity description: Mitchell v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the scope of Fifth Amendment protections, particularly concerning a defendant’s right against self-incrimination at sentencing.
-
A.
United Public Workers v. Mitchell
United Public Workers v. Mitchell is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act’s restrictions on federal employees’ political activities.
-
B.
Dennis v. United States
Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
-
C.
Yates v. United States
Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
-
D.
Abrams v. United States
Abrams v. United States was a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the conviction of antiwar activists under federal law and is best known for Justice Holmes’s famous dissent articulating the “marketplace of ideas” concept in free speech jurisprudence.
-
E.
Oregon v. Mitchell
Oregon v. Mitchell was a 1970 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of federal laws regulating state and local election procedures, including provisions of the Voting Rights Act Amendments of 1970.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (45)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Fifth Amendment case
ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ criminal procedure case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional criminal procedure
ⓘ
sentencing law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1998-10-06 ⓘ |
| citation | 526 U.S. 314 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1999-04-05 ⓘ |
| decisionType | majority opinion with dissent ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Justice Stephen G. Breyer
ⓘ
linked to:
Stephen G. Breyer
|
| docketNumber | 97-7541 ⓘ |
| fullName |
Mitchell v. United States, 526 U.S. 314 (1999)
ⓘ
linked to:
Mitchell v. United States
|
| holding |
A guilty plea does not waive the self-incrimination privilege at sentencing
ⓘ
A sentencing court may not draw an adverse inference from a defendant’s silence in determining facts about the crime that bear upon the severity of the sentence ⓘ |
| impact |
clarified that defendants retain Fifth Amendment protections through sentencing
ⓘ
limited the ability of sentencing courts to penalize a defendant’s silence ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
ⓘ
linked to:
William H. Rehnquist
Justice Antonin Scalia ⓘ
linked to:
Antonin Scalia
Justice Clarence Thomas ⓘ
linked to:
Clarence Thomas
Justice David H. Souter ⓘ
linked to:
David H. Souter
Justice John Paul Stevens ⓘ
linked to:
John Paul Stevens
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ
linked to:
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor ⓘ
linked to:
Sandra Day O’Connor
|
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| languageOfDecision | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
scope of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination at sentencing
ⓘ
whether a guilty plea waives the privilege against self-incrimination at sentencing ⓘ whether a sentencing court may draw an adverse inference from a defendant’s silence ⓘ |
| lowerCourtDisposition | affirmed in part and reversed in part ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
ⓘ
linked to:
Anthony M. Kennedy
|
| originatingCourt | United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ⓘ |
| page | 314 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Amanda Mitchell NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine |
adverse inference from silence
ⓘ
effects of guilty plea on constitutional rights ⓘ privilege against self-incrimination ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| subjectMatter | federal drug offense sentencing ⓘ |
| subsequentCitationFrequency | frequently cited in Fifth Amendment sentencing jurisprudence ⓘ |
| volume | 526 ⓘ |
| vote | 8-1 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Mitchell v. United States Description of subject: Mitchell v. United States is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the scope of Fifth Amendment protections, particularly concerning a defendant’s right against self-incrimination at sentencing.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
linked to: Mitchell v. United States