Colegrove v. Green
E363606
Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
All labels observed (1)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Colegrove v. Green canonical | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3488668 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Colegrove v. Green Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court, includesCase, Colegrove v. Green]
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
-
C.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
-
D.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Colegrove v. Green Target entity description: Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
-
A.
Briggs v. Elliott
Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
-
B.
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green is a 1973 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the key burden-shifting framework for proving employment discrimination under Title VII.
-
C.
Grovey v. Townsend
Grovey v. Townsend was a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule, later repudiated as unconstitutional racial discrimination in voting.
-
D.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
E.
Cooley v. Board of Wardens
Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
election law case ⓘ federal court case ⓘ redistricting case ⓘ |
| hasCategory |
United States Supreme Court cases on justiciability
ⓘ
linked to:
United States Supreme Court cases
United States Supreme Court cases on legislative apportionment ⓘ |
| hasCitation | 328 U.S. 549 ⓘ |
| hasConcurrenceFrom |
Hugo Black
ⓘ
linked to:
Hugo L. Black
|
| hasConstitutionalProvisionInvolved |
Article I of the United States Constitution
ⓘ
Elections Clause ⓘ Guarantee Clause ⓘ |
| hasContext | challenge to Illinois congressional districts ⓘ |
| hasCountry |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasDecisionDate | June 10, 1946 ⓘ |
| hasDissentFrom |
Frank Murphy
ⓘ
Hugo Black ⓘ
linked to:
Hugo L. Black
William O. Douglas ⓘ |
| hasEffect |
delayed judicial intervention in redistricting disputes
ⓘ
limited federal judicial review of legislative apportionment prior to the 1960s ⓘ |
| hasHolding |
claims of legislative apportionment and malapportionment present nonjusticiable political questions
ⓘ
federal courts lack authority to intervene in certain legislative apportionment disputes ⓘ |
| hasJurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| hasKeyPhrase | courts ought not to enter this political thicket ⓘ |
| hasLaterTreatment |
limited by subsequent reapportionment cases
ⓘ
partially overruled by Baker v. Carr ⓘ |
| hasLegalIssue |
justiciability
ⓘ
political question doctrine ⓘ |
| hasLocation | Illinois ⓘ |
| hasOpinionAuthor | Felix Frankfurter ⓘ |
| hasOpinionType | plurality opinion ⓘ |
| hasOutcome | relief denied to plaintiffs challenging congressional districting ⓘ |
| hasPetitioner | Colegrove ⓘ |
| hasPrecedentialStatus | precedent on political question doctrine ⓘ |
| hasReporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| hasRespondent | Green ⓘ |
| hasSubjectMatter |
legislative apportionment
ⓘ
malapportionment ⓘ redistricting ⓘ |
| hasTimePeriod | post-New Deal era ⓘ |
| hasVoteSplit | 4-3 decision ⓘ |
| hasYear | 1946 ⓘ |
| isRelatedAreaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
election law ⓘ federal courts ⓘ |
| isRelatedCase |
Baker v. Carr
ⓘ
Reynolds v. Sims ⓘ
linked to:
Reynolds v. Sims decision
|
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Colegrove v. Green Description of subject: Colegrove v. Green is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court decision known for holding that issues of legislative apportionment and malapportionment were nonjusticiable political questions, delaying judicial intervention in redistricting disputes.
Referenced by (1)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.