Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims

Target entity: Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims
Context triple: [William M. Evarts, notableWork, Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims]

• A. The Prize Cases
  The Prize Cases were a landmark 1863 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to blockade Confederate ports without a formal declaration of war, expanding the scope of executive war powers.
• B. British arbitration in the Beagle conflict
  British arbitration in the Beagle conflict was an international legal process in which the United Kingdom acted as neutral arbiter to resolve a territorial dispute between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries in the Beagle Channel.
• C. Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
  Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
• D. Uniform Rules for the Court of Claims
  The Uniform Rules for the Court of Claims are a codified set of procedural regulations governing how civil cases against the State of New York and certain public authorities are conducted in the New York Court of Claims.
• E. United States v. Kagama
  United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims
Target entity description: Arguments before the Geneva Tribunal on the Alabama Claims is a collection of influential legal arguments presented by American lawyer William M. Evarts in the international arbitration case between the United States and Great Britain over Civil War-era maritime claims.

• A. The Prize Cases
  The Prize Cases were a landmark 1863 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to blockade Confederate ports without a formal declaration of war, expanding the scope of executive war powers.
• B. British arbitration in the Beagle conflict
  British arbitration in the Beagle conflict was an international legal process in which the United Kingdom acted as neutral arbiter to resolve a territorial dispute between Argentina and Chile over islands and maritime boundaries in the Beagle Channel.
• C. Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863)
  Dissent in the Prize Cases (1863) is a notable Supreme Court opinion in which Justice Samuel Nelson argued against the majority’s validation of President Lincoln’s Civil War blockade powers.
• D. Uniform Rules for the Court of Claims
  The Uniform Rules for the Court of Claims are a codified set of procedural regulations governing how civil cases against the State of New York and certain public authorities are conducted in the New York Court of Claims.
• E. United States v. Kagama
  United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
• F. None of above. chosen