United States v. Kagama
E330551
United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| United States v. Kagama canonical | 2 |
| United States v. Kagama (1886) | 1 |
| United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886) | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T3133470 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kagama Context triple: [Morrison R. Waite, presidedOver, United States v. Kagama]
-
A.
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime internment of Japanese Americans, later widely condemned as a grave civil liberties violation.
-
B.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
-
C.
The Prize Cases
The Prize Cases were a landmark 1863 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to blockade Confederate ports without a formal declaration of war, expanding the scope of executive war powers.
-
D.
Hirabayashi v. United States
Hirabayashi v. United States is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime curfew and restrictions imposed on Japanese Americans during World War II.
-
E.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: United States v. Kagama Target entity description: United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
-
A.
Korematsu v. United States
Korematsu v. United States is a landmark 1944 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime internment of Japanese Americans, later widely condemned as a grave civil liberties violation.
-
B.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.
United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp. is a landmark 1936 U.S. Supreme Court case that broadly affirmed the president’s independent and plenary authority in conducting foreign affairs.
-
C.
The Prize Cases
The Prize Cases were a landmark 1863 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld President Abraham Lincoln’s authority to blockade Confederate ports without a formal declaration of war, expanding the scope of executive war powers.
-
D.
Hirabayashi v. United States
Hirabayashi v. United States is a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime curfew and restrictions imposed on Japanese Americans during World War II.
-
E.
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
U.S. Supreme Court case
ⓘ
federal Indian law case ⓘ |
| affects |
criminal jurisdiction in Indian Country
ⓘ
tribal sovereignty ⓘ |
| concerns |
crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations
ⓘ
federal-tribal relations ⓘ limits of tribal sovereignty ⓘ |
| hasCitation | 118 U.S. 375 ⓘ |
| hasCountry | United States of America ⓘ |
| hasCourt | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| hasDecisionDate | 1886-05-10 ⓘ |
| hasDefendant | Kagama ⓘ |
| hasFullCitation |
United States v. Kagama, 118 U.S. 375 (1886)
ⓘ
linked to:
United States v. Kagama
|
| hasJurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| hasJustice |
Horace Gray
ⓘ
John Marshall Harlan ⓘ Joseph P. Bradley ⓘ Morrison Waite ⓘ
linked to:
Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
Samuel Blatchford ⓘ Samuel Freeman Miller ⓘ Stanley Matthews ⓘ Stephen Johnson Field ⓘ William Burnham Woods ⓘ |
| hasKeyDoctrine |
guardian-ward theory of federal-tribal relations
ⓘ
plenary power doctrine ⓘ |
| hasLanguage | English ⓘ |
| hasLegalArea |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ federal Indian law ⓘ |
| hasOpinionAuthor | Samuel Freeman Miller ⓘ |
| hasPage | 375 ⓘ |
| hasPlaintiff |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| hasReporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| hasSubject |
Major Crimes Act
ⓘ
congressional power over Indian affairs ⓘ federal jurisdiction over crimes in Indian Country ⓘ |
| hasTypeOfParty |
Native American defendant
ⓘ
federal government as plaintiff ⓘ |
| hasVolume | 118 ⓘ |
| hasYear | 1886 ⓘ |
| held |
Congress has authority to exercise criminal jurisdiction over certain major crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations
ⓘ
the Major Crimes Act is constitutional ⓘ
linked to:
Major Crimes Act
|
| interprets |
U.S. Constitution
ⓘ
linked to:
United States Constitution
scope of congressional power over Indian tribes ⓘ |
| isLocatedInReporter |
United States Reports, volume 118
ⓘ
linked to:
United States Reports
|
| precededBy | Ex parte Crow Dog ⓘ |
| reinforced | plenary power of Congress over Indian affairs ⓘ |
| upheldStatute | Major Crimes Act of 1885 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: United States v. Kagama Description of subject: United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
Referenced by (4)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject linked to:
Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite
linked to: United States v. Kagama
linked to: United States v. Kagama