Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy

E285389

The Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy was a 5th-century Christological dispute over whether Christ had one divine nature or two natures, which deeply divided the Eastern Roman Empire and helped prompt the Council of Chalcedon.

All labels observed (7)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 5th-century religious controversy ⓘ
Christological controversy ⓘ
theological dispute ⓘ
associatedDocument Tome of Leo ⓘ
associatedTerm Monophysitism ⓘ
linked to: Miaphysitism
centerOfDebate Chalcedon ⓘ
Constantinople ⓘ
Ephesus ⓘ
concernsDoctrine Christology ⓘ
nature of Christ ⓘ
debatedQuestion whether Christ has one nature or two natures ⓘ
geographicalContext Byzantine Empire ⓘ
Eastern Roman Empire ⓘ
linked to: Byzantine Empire
hasAlternativeName Eutychian controversy ⓘ
Monophysite controversy ⓘ
hasMainFigure Eutyches ⓘ
historicalImpact contributed to long-term schisms in Eastern Christianity ⓘ
deeply divided the Eastern Roman Empire ⓘ
imperialContext reign of Marcian ⓘ
reign of Theodosius II ⓘ
involvesCondemnationOf Eutyches ⓘ
Monophysitism ⓘ
involvesPosition Christ has only one nature (divine) after the Incarnation ⓘ
Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person ⓘ
keyConcept divine and human in Christ ⓘ
one nature of Christ after the Incarnation ⓘ
languageOfDebate Greek ⓘ
leadsTo definition of the two natures of Christ at Chalcedon ⓘ
longTermConsequence division between Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian churches ⓘ
formation of Oriental Orthodox Churches ⓘ
opposedBy Flavian of Constantinople ⓘ
Pope Leo I ⓘ
opposedTerm Dyophysitism ⓘ
relatedCouncil Council of Chalcedon ⓘ
Second Council of Ephesus ⓘ
relatedTo Council of Ephesus (431) ⓘ
linked to: Council of Ephesus

Nestorian controversy ⓘ
religiousContext Christianity ⓘ
Eastern Christianity ⓘ
resultedIn Chalcedonian Definition ⓘ
condemnation of extreme Monophysite views ⓘ
startApproximate c. 448 ⓘ
theologicalCategory debate on Christ’s divine and human natures ⓘ
debate on hypostatic union ⓘ
timePeriod 5th century ⓘ
triggeredCouncil Council of Chalcedon ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (12)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Theodosius II → significantEvent → Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy ⓘ
Three Chapters controversy → relatedTo → Monophysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Three Chapters → linkedTo → Miaphysite–Chalcedonian conflict ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Coptic period → religiousConflict → Chalcedonian–Miaphysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Nestorian controversy → followedBy → Monophysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutyches → associatedWith → Monophysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy → hasAlternativeName → Eutychian controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy → hasAlternativeName → Monophysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
revolt of Basiliscus → religiousPolicyContext → Monophysite–Chalcedonian controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Pope Simplicius → conflict → Monophysite controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Contra Severum → associatedWith → Byzantine–Monophysite controversies ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Domnus II of Antioch → controversy → Eutychian controversy ⓘ
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy