Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy

E285389

The Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy was a 5th-century Christological dispute over whether Christ had one divine nature or two natures, which deeply divided the Eastern Roman Empire and helped prompt the Council of Chalcedon.

All labels observed (5)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf 5th-century religious controversy
Christological controversy
theological dispute
associatedDocument Tome of Leo
associatedTerm Monophysitism
linked to: Miaphysitism
centerOfDebate Chalcedon
Constantinople
Ephesus
concernsDoctrine Christology
nature of Christ
debatedQuestion whether Christ has one nature or two natures
geographicalContext Byzantine Empire
Eastern Roman Empire
linked to: Byzantine Empire
hasAlternativeName Eutychian controversy
Monophysite controversy
hasMainFigure Eutyches
historicalImpact contributed to long-term schisms in Eastern Christianity
deeply divided the Eastern Roman Empire
imperialContext reign of Marcian
reign of Theodosius II
involvesCondemnationOf Eutyches
Monophysitism
involvesPosition Christ has only one nature (divine) after the Incarnation
Christ has two natures, divine and human, united in one person
keyConcept divine and human in Christ
one nature of Christ after the Incarnation
languageOfDebate Greek
leadsTo definition of the two natures of Christ at Chalcedon
longTermConsequence division between Chalcedonian and non-Chalcedonian churches
formation of Oriental Orthodox Churches
opposedBy Flavian of Constantinople
Pope Leo I
opposedTerm Dyophysitism
relatedCouncil Council of Chalcedon
Second Council of Ephesus
relatedTo Council of Ephesus (431)
linked to: Council of Ephesus

Nestorian controversy
religiousContext Christianity
Eastern Christianity
resultedIn Chalcedonian Definition
condemnation of extreme Monophysite views
startApproximate c. 448
theologicalCategory debate on Christ’s divine and human natures
debate on hypostatic union
timePeriod 5th century
triggeredCouncil Council of Chalcedon

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (8)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Theodosius II significantEvent Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Three Chapters controversy relatedTo Monophysite controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Three Chapters linkedTo Miaphysite–Chalcedonian conflict
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Coptic period religiousConflict Chalcedonian–Miaphysite controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Nestorian controversy followedBy Monophysite controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutyches associatedWith Monophysite controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy hasAlternativeName Eutychian controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy
Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy hasAlternativeName Monophysite controversy
linked to: Eutychian (Monophysite) controversy