Rostker v. Goldberg
E282164
Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
All labels observed (2)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Rostker v. Goldberg canonical | 2 |
| Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al. | 1 |
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T2601173 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rostker v. Goldberg Context triple: [Military Selective Service Act, associatedCase, Rostker v. Goldberg]
-
A.
Goldberg v. Kelly
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
D.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
E.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rostker v. Goldberg Target entity description: Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
-
A.
Goldberg v. Kelly
Goldberg v. Kelly is a landmark 1970 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before their benefits are terminated, significantly expanding procedural due process protections.
-
B.
Bolling v. Sharpe
Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
-
C.
Katzenbach v. Morgan
Katzenbach v. Morgan is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit certain state voting restrictions, reinforcing federal authority to protect voting rights.
-
D.
Eisenstadt v. Baird
Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
-
E.
Corrigan v. Buckley
Corrigan v. Buckley is a 1926 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the enforceability of racially restrictive covenants in property deeds, paving the way for widespread legalized housing segregation until later overturned in effect by subsequent civil rights rulings.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
legal case ⓘ |
| arguedDate | 1980-10-07 ⓘ |
| citation |
101 S. Ct. 2646
ⓘ
453 U.S. 57 ⓘ 69 L. Ed. 2d 478 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted | Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedBy | Burger Court ⓘ |
| decidedIn | Washington, D.C. ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1981-06-25 ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Harry A. Blackmun
ⓘ
Thurgood Marshall ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al.
ⓘ
linked to:
Rostker v. Goldberg
|
| holding |
Congress may require only men to register for the draft
ⓘ
The Military Selective Service Act’s male-only registration requirement does not violate the Fifth Amendment ⓘ |
| impact | affirmed legality of excluding women from draft registration ⓘ |
| joinedMajority |
Byron R. White
ⓘ
Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ Potter Stewart ⓘ Warren E. Burger ⓘ William H. Rehnquist ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. (in part) ⓘ
linked to:
William J. Brennan Jr.
|
| jurisdiction |
United States
ⓘ
linked to:
United States of America
|
| languageOfCase | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Equal Protection component of the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause
ⓘ
constitutionality of male-only draft registration ⓘ |
| legalProvision | Military Selective Service Act ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| petitioner |
Bernard Rostker
ⓘ
United States Selective Service System ⓘ
linked to:
Selective Service System
|
| precedentFor | cases involving gender classifications in military policy ⓘ |
| rearguedDate | 1981-03-24 ⓘ |
| relatedAreaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
equal protection jurisprudence ⓘ military law ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine | judicial deference to Congress in military matters ⓘ |
| respondent | Robert L. Goldberg ⓘ |
| result | male-only draft registration upheld as constitutional ⓘ |
| standardOfReview | deference to Congress in matters of military affairs ⓘ |
| term | October Term 1980 ⓘ |
| topic |
gender discrimination
ⓘ
military draft ⓘ selective service ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1981 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
Instruction
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Input
Subject: Rostker v. Goldberg Description of subject: Rostker v. Goldberg is a 1981 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of requiring only men, and not women, to register for the military draft.
Referenced by (3)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Rostker v. Goldberg
→
fullCaseName
→
Bernard Rostker, Director of Selective Service, et al. v. Robert L. Goldberg et al.
ⓘ
linked to: Rostker v. Goldberg