Jurek v. Texas

E266471

Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.

All labels observed (2)

Label Occurrences
Jurek v. Texas canonical 8
Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976) 1

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (53)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
capital punishment case ⓘ
areaOfLaw constitutional law ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ
criminal procedure ⓘ
argued 1976-03-30 ⓘ
citation 428 U.S. 262 ⓘ
concurrenceBy Chief Justice Warren E. Burger ⓘ
linked to: Warren E. Burger

Justice John Paul Stevens ⓘ
linked to: John Paul Stevens

Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ
linked to: Lewis F. Powell Jr.
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Eighth Amendment ⓘ
Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decidedWith Gregg v. Georgia ⓘ
Proffitt v. Florida ⓘ
Roberts v. Louisiana (1976) ⓘ
Woodson v. North Carolina ⓘ
decisionDate 1976-07-02 ⓘ
dissentBy Justice Byron White ⓘ
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Thurgood Marshall ⓘ
linked to: Thurgood Marshall

Justice William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ
Justice William O. Douglas ⓘ
linked to: William O. Douglas
docketNumber 75-5394 ⓘ
fullCaseName Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
holding Guided discretion in capital sentencing can satisfy Eighth Amendment requirements. ⓘ
The Texas capital sentencing procedure is not per se unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. ⓘ
joinedByInPlurality Justice Byron White ⓘ
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Harry Blackmun ⓘ
linked to: Harry A. Blackmun
jurisdiction federal ⓘ
legalSubject Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
capital punishment ⓘ
cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Justice Byron White ⓘ
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Harry Blackmun ⓘ
linked to: Harry A. Blackmun

Justice Potter Stewart ⓘ
linked to: Potter Stewart
originatingCourt Texas Court of Criminal Appeals ⓘ
pageInUnitedStatesReports 262 ⓘ
petitioner Jerry Lane Jurek ⓘ
pluralityOpinionBy Justice Potter Stewart ⓘ
linked to: Potter Stewart
reargued 1976-04-28 ⓘ
relatedTo Furman v. Georgia ⓘ
Gregg v. Georgia ⓘ
Proffitt v. Florida ⓘ
Roberts v. Louisiana (1976) ⓘ
Woodson v. North Carolina ⓘ
respondent State of Texas ⓘ
linked to: Texas
result death sentence affirmed ⓘ
stateInvolved Texas ⓘ
topic bifurcated capital trial ⓘ
future dangerousness ⓘ
guided discretion in death penalty sentencing ⓘ
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 428 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (9)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Branch v. Texas → relatedToCase → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Gregg v. Georgia → decidedWith → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Jurek v. Texas → fullCaseName → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Proffitt v. Florida → relatedCase → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Woodson v. North Carolina → relatedCase → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Roberts v. Louisiana → relatedCase → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Jerry Lane Jurek → defendantIn → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Jerry Lane Jurek → subjectOf → Jurek v. Texas ⓘ
Jerry Lane Jurek → legalCaseCitation → Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (1976) ⓘ
linked to: Jurek v. Texas