Jurek v. Texas

E266471

Jurek v. Texas is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of Texas’s capital sentencing scheme and helped define the modern framework for death penalty procedures under the Eighth Amendment.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Jurek v. Texas canonical 6

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (53)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case
United States Supreme Court case
capital punishment case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal law
criminal procedure
argued 1976-03-30
citation 428 U.S. 262
concurrenceBy Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
linked to: Warren E. Burger

Justice John Paul Stevens
linked to: John Paul Stevens

Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr.
linked to: Lewis F. Powell Jr.
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Eighth Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment
court Supreme Court of the United States
decidedWith Gregg v. Georgia
Proffitt v. Florida
Roberts v. Louisiana (1976)
Woodson v. North Carolina
decisionDate 1976-07-02
dissentBy Justice Byron White
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Thurgood Marshall
linked to: Thurgood Marshall

Justice William J. Brennan Jr.
Justice William O. Douglas
linked to: William O. Douglas
docketNumber 75-5394
fullCaseName Jurek v. Texas
holding Guided discretion in capital sentencing can satisfy Eighth Amendment requirements.
The Texas capital sentencing procedure is not per se unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
joinedByInPlurality Justice Byron White
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Harry Blackmun
linked to: Harry A. Blackmun
jurisdiction federal
legalSubject Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution
capital punishment
cruel and unusual punishment
majorityOpinionBy Justice Byron White
linked to: Byron R. White

Justice Harry Blackmun
linked to: Harry A. Blackmun

Justice Potter Stewart
linked to: Potter Stewart
originatingCourt Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
pageInUnitedStatesReports 262
petitioner Jerry Lane Jurek
pluralityOpinionBy Justice Potter Stewart
linked to: Potter Stewart
reargued 1976-04-28
relatedTo Furman v. Georgia
Gregg v. Georgia
Proffitt v. Florida
Roberts v. Louisiana (1976)
Woodson v. North Carolina
respondent State of Texas
linked to: Texas
result death sentence affirmed
stateInvolved Texas
topic bifurcated capital trial
future dangerousness
guided discretion in death penalty sentencing
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 428

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (6)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Branch v. Texas relatedToCase Jurek v. Texas
Gregg v. Georgia decidedWith Jurek v. Texas
Jurek v. Texas fullCaseName Jurek v. Texas
Proffitt v. Florida relatedCase Jurek v. Texas
Woodson v. North Carolina relatedCase Jurek v. Texas
Roberts v. Louisiana relatedCase Jurek v. Texas