Hudson v. McMillian

E266469

Hudson v. McMillian is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court case that held that the use of excessive physical force against a prisoner can violate the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury.

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Eighth Amendment case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
appliesTo federal prisoners ⓘ
state prisoners ⓘ
areaOfLaw civil rights ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
prisoners' rights ⓘ
arguedDate 1991-10-15 ⓘ
citation 503 U.S. 1 ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
country United States ⓘ
court Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1992-02-25 ⓘ
decisionType majority decision ⓘ
dissentingJustices Antonin Scalia ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ
dissentType dissenting opinion ⓘ
docketNumber 90-6531 ⓘ
fullName Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
holding The use of excessive physical force against a prisoner may constitute cruel and unusual punishment even when the inmate does not suffer serious injury. ⓘ
impact lowered threshold for prisoners to bring Eighth Amendment excessive force claims ⓘ
jurisdiction United States federal law ⓘ
languageOfOpinion English ⓘ
legalIssue Eighth Amendment cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ
excessive force against prisoners ⓘ
legalPrinciple Excessive force that is malicious and sadistic violates the Eighth Amendment regardless of the extent of injury. ⓘ
majorityJustices Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ
Byron R. White ⓘ
David H. Souter ⓘ
Harry A. Blackmun ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ
Sandra Day O'Connor ⓘ
Thurgood Marshall ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Justice Sandra Day O'Connor ⓘ
originatingCourt United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ⓘ
pageInUnitedStatesReports 1 ⓘ
petitioner Keith Hudson ⓘ
precedentFor standards for excessive force claims by prisoners ⓘ
rejectedRequirement significant injury requirement for Eighth Amendment excessive force claims ⓘ
relatedCase Whitley v. Albers ⓘ
Wilkins v. Gaddy ⓘ
respondent John McMillian ⓘ
standardAnnounced The core judicial inquiry is whether force was applied in a good-faith effort to maintain or restore discipline, or maliciously and sadistically to cause harm. ⓘ
topic conditions of confinement ⓘ
cruel and unusual punishment ⓘ
volumeOfUnitedStatesReports 503 ⓘ
voteSplit 7-2 ⓘ
yearDecided 1992 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Hudson v. McMillian → fullName → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
John McMillian → partyTo → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
John McMillian → courtCaseResultedIn → U.S. Supreme Court decision in Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
linked to: Hudson v. McMillian
Whitley v. Albers → followedBy → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
Wilkins v. Gaddy → clarifies → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
Wilkins v. Gaddy → relatedCase → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
Wilkins v. Gaddy → standardSource → Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992) ⓘ
linked to: Hudson v. McMillian
Keith Hudson → partyToCase → Hudson v. McMillian ⓘ
Keith Hudson → associatedCourtDecision → Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 (1992) ⓘ
linked to: Hudson v. McMillian
Keith Hudson → caseCitation → Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1 ⓘ
linked to: Hudson v. McMillian