Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion

E204382

The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.

All labels observed (8)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf economic efficiency criterion ⓘ
welfare economics concept ⓘ
aimsAt efficiency evaluation without explicit value judgments on equity ⓘ
alsoKnownAs Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion ⓘ
appliesTo policy changes with winners and losers ⓘ
assumes individual preferences are given ⓘ
interpersonal utility comparisons are not required ⓘ
monetary measures of gains and losses ⓘ
category economic theorems and concepts ⓘ
compares alternative social states ⓘ
contrastsWith actual Pareto improvement ⓘ
coreIdea a policy change is desirable if gainers could in principle compensate losers and still be better off ⓘ
criticizedFor ignoring distributional consequences ⓘ
not ensuring losers are actually compensated ⓘ
path dependence of evaluations ⓘ
possibility of inconsistent social rankings ⓘ
defines Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
doesNotRequire actual compensation ⓘ
field cost–benefit analysis ⓘ
microeconomics ⓘ
welfare economics ⓘ
generalizes Pareto improvement concept ⓘ
hasLimitation depends on initial income distribution ⓘ
sensitive to choice of numeraire ⓘ
influenced modern cost–benefit analysis standards ⓘ
influencedBy Paretian welfare economics ⓘ
linked to: welfare economics
involves potential Pareto improvement ⓘ
language English term ⓘ
measurementBasis willingness to accept ⓘ
willingness to pay ⓘ
namedAfter John Hicks ⓘ
linked to: John R. Hicks

Nicholas Kaldor ⓘ
originPeriod 1930s ⓘ
relatedTo Pareto efficiency ⓘ
Scitovsky paradox ⓘ
requires aggregate gains exceed aggregate losses in monetary terms ⓘ
potential compensation only ⓘ
usedIn cost–benefit analysis of public projects ⓘ
law and economics ⓘ
policy evaluation ⓘ
usedToJustify policies with net monetary benefits ⓘ
uses hypothetical compensation test ⓘ
weakerThan Pareto criterion ⓘ
linked to: Pareto efficiency

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (13)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

John R. Hicks → knownFor → Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion ⓘ
law and economics movement → coreConcept → Kaldor-Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Pareto efficiency → relatedConcept → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
welfare economics → usesConcept → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion → alsoKnownAs → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion → defines → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion → relatedTo → Scitovsky paradox ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor → notableWork → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
subject linked to: Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor → notableFor → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept ⓘ
subject linked to: Baron Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor → notableIdea → Kaldor–Hicks compensation principle ⓘ
subject linked to: Baron Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Economic Analysis of Law → appliesConcept → Kaldor–Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Harberger triangle → relatedTo → Kaldor-Hicks efficiency ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Pareto improvement → contrastedWith → Kaldor–Hicks improvement ⓘ
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion