Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion

E204382

The Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion is an economic efficiency test stating that a policy change is desirable if those who gain could in principle compensate those who lose and still be better off, regardless of whether compensation actually occurs.

All labels observed (7)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (43)

Predicate Object
instanceOf economic efficiency criterion
welfare economics concept
aimsAt efficiency evaluation without explicit value judgments on equity
alsoKnownAs Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion
appliesTo policy changes with winners and losers
assumes individual preferences are given
interpersonal utility comparisons are not required
monetary measures of gains and losses
category economic theorems and concepts
compares alternative social states
contrastsWith actual Pareto improvement
coreIdea a policy change is desirable if gainers could in principle compensate losers and still be better off
criticizedFor ignoring distributional consequences
not ensuring losers are actually compensated
path dependence of evaluations
possibility of inconsistent social rankings
defines Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
doesNotRequire actual compensation
field cost–benefit analysis
microeconomics
welfare economics
generalizes Pareto improvement concept
hasLimitation depends on initial income distribution
sensitive to choice of numeraire
influenced modern cost–benefit analysis standards
influencedBy Paretian welfare economics
linked to: welfare economics
involves potential Pareto improvement
language English term
measurementBasis willingness to accept
willingness to pay
namedAfter John Hicks
linked to: John R. Hicks

Nicholas Kaldor
originPeriod 1930s
relatedTo Pareto efficiency
Scitovsky paradox
requires aggregate gains exceed aggregate losses in monetary terms
potential compensation only
usedIn cost–benefit analysis of public projects
law and economics
policy evaluation
usedToJustify policies with net monetary benefits
uses hypothetical compensation test
weakerThan Pareto criterion
linked to: Pareto efficiency

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (11)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

John R. Hicks knownFor Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
law and economics movement coreConcept Kaldor-Hicks efficiency
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Pareto efficiency relatedConcept Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
welfare economics usesConcept Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion alsoKnownAs Kaldor–Hicks efficiency criterion
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion defines Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion relatedTo Scitovsky paradox
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor notableWork Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
subject linked to: Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor notableFor Kaldor–Hicks efficiency concept
subject linked to: Baron Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Nicholas Kaldor notableIdea Kaldor–Hicks compensation principle
subject linked to: Baron Kaldor
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion
Economic Analysis of Law appliesConcept Kaldor–Hicks efficiency
linked to: Hicks–Kaldor compensation criterion